1. Declaring that an individual is mentally ill and "unfit" to give instructions and represent his own interests in the adversarial-based legal system.

I have seen this tactic used while in prison on a supposed mentally ill man on remand. He seemed heavily depressed and down-beat but not crazy and did not seem mentally ill. I had spoken to him about his case, as with most prisoners. He was pressured and harassed by prison staff and so-called psyche-nurses to pleas guilty, all-the-while the psyche-staff member has absolutely malevolent and dodgy expression glued to his face. I told him to listen to Me or a lawyer and the staff intervened. Some cases have insufficient evidence or are weak cases when this happens. I had interviewed and questioned prisoners and staff members involved as well as often reading the "brief" of evidence as well.

This is not a conspiracy. I repeat : This is not a conspiracy. It is usually just that the job of prison forensic psychiatrist and prison guard attracts those who have strong and lie-based personal views on crime and the justice system and wish to meddle with it. They do this because they believe in society and it's insane claims of justice. There is also an authoritarian culture element, where these jobs encourage such behavior.

2. Jailing a legally innocent man under the lie-based and hypocritical "remand" atrocity and then using pressure and coercion from societal whore lawyers, prison guards and environmental conditions to bully the unjustly jailed victim-creation of society into muttering one word ("guilty") and then legally claiming that justifies all retrospective unjust and malevolent treatment of the prisoner.

One example of this was a friend I had in prison, whom I will just call "DB". DB was held for the first time in jail under the remand system. He had never been charged with any indictable crime before. He was held for months on end, without being told what would happen to him. Of course, he had every reason and right to have committed his offences, and the entire justice charade was just un utterly unjust farce. His lawyer told him to plead guilty to arson, and if he did so he would be set free with "time served". He asked Me about it, and while I said it was possible, it was unlikely that such a small sentence would be given, especially as the last few years saw higher sentences for lesser crimes. He took the lawyers advice, took "the deal" as was given a sentence 6 times what was expected. This is a typical occurrence. They lawyer would have known better based on the details of the case. His lawyer here was acting as a societal whore and judged his client - and concluded he "should" be locked up in jail.

3. Simply adjourning the trial once or several times for months at a time for no valid reason while the "remand" prisoner is in custody. The prisoner is then told that a guilty plea hearing will be accepted any time one wants, inferring that remand jail will continue until a guilty plea is entered. This message is delivered by the adjourning judge and reinforced by the defendant's lawyers.

This is what happened to Me, and reportedly also to Martin Bryant. It can be a conspiracy, but not need be. Often the involved can simply all see that is what is happening, agree with it, and all "pitch in" and keep the other judges and lawyers informed about what they want.

4. Use of the lie-based and utterly malevolent "illegal combatant" and "war on terror" systems to remove whatever shallow and near-useless legal rights society claims to grant you.

Commonly and covertly known tactic to circumvent the trial system. Can involve all of the above tactics.

The primary reason why I have been unfairly and illegally treated this way by the australian justice system is simply because I reveal Forbidden Truths. I have had a long history of serious threats and illegal harassment against Me by authorities. I have been labeled an "anarchist" by police and placed on several lists.

A trial denial is a rare thing to happen, and I might again explain why. Your utterly deranged and malevolent society is constantly looking for ways to victimize, imprison, threaten and silence Seers of Forbidden Truth while at the same time using various smokescreens to pretend that it is merely routinely enforcing the law/rules etc. Societal leaders fear the Forbidden Truth and instruct all their citizen-slaves to reject Truth, and keep any in-depth criticisms of societal institutions to themselves.

A Forbidden Truth website was claimed to have been run by Me personally, and that is why I could not ever get bail, and why I was refused a trial. This website was nothing to do with the charges. Societal leaders had detected that the Forbidden Truth was being revealed, and started a campaign against Me in the belief that I was responsible for the revelations. The denial of trial and other treatment was not because I had committed a crime, not because I was a violent individual, not because of some of-the-table concern. Only because of an utterly insane and irrational prejudice and bias against Me because I represent Forbidden Truth. 

Take the case of David Hicks. Victim David did not get a trial, but he was held at a secret prison overseas under the insane and illegitimate legal label of being "an illegal combatant." He did not commit the alleged actions in australia. David's unjust treatment does not have the hallmarks of the denial of trial in the same way that I was denied a trial. That is not to say that David's treatment has any legitimacy to it just because it was technically legal. David's treatment overseas and in australia was unjust and utterly merit less and malevolent.

If you have read this website, you should realize by now that the law has no Truth-based legitimacy. You should laugh at the "illegal combatant" label for David, recognizing how absurd and wafer-thin such a claim really is. While David's treatment is more well-known, what is not being reported in mainstream media is the same general tactics used on David Hicks are being used for criminal charges against individuals in australia in regular court cases. I am one such individual who has experienced this.

Another individual is Martin Bryant, who is a featured victim of this website, was reportedly forced/coerced to plead guilty. Martin had the maturity of a younger child, and pressure and torture was used against Martin. Martin reportedly plead "not guilty" twice in court, and the court did not accept Martin's "not guilty" plea. That's a reported fact. When Martin was unlawfully and immorally forced into pleading guilty, the court jumped on it. The court accepted that plea immediately. It got what it wanted. This is like one of the processes used against Me, except I would not plead guilty and actually went to trial no less than three times and was refused a trial. A fourth trial was not likely to proceed, either.

Although Martin was charged with many, many counts of murder, I was charged with only a mid-level offence. My charges were not murder charges, nor attempted murder. No-one was hurt. Nor was there any hostages, bombs, co-conspirators, cults, groups, or other imminent danger scenarios involved. There were no witnesses to the alleged crime.

Yes, at committal phase, the police admitted under oath that it could have been virtually anybody who committed the offense. However, I could not put the forensic test results to him, because the magistrate illegally ordered these results to be confiscated from My brief of evidence. The informant lied and said he thought that the tests were not ready yet, but had been ready for months. The magistrate also must have known, because he removed the forensic tests from the brief when Shane Lethlean gave it to him instead of Me. The magistrate illegally dictated that he would decide which documents from My brief I would be allowed access to and which ones I would not be allowed access to. The magistrate also denied Me the right to have time to hire a new lawyer, or be given proper facilities to prepare in. He gave Me a few hours in a cell so tiny that I had to stand or crouch with nothing but a poor-quality pencil and the limited documents he decided I could have.

The only evidence the police had were the means. I never denied this. Yes, I had the means. It could have been Me. However, under oath the police admitted it could have been nearly anybody. This "means" involved the purchase of a common item similar to that used in the offense 50 minutes before the crime was committed. The forensic tests did not positively match the item I bought with the one used, either way.

The problem is, that I legally bought the item, I was in that area on a regular basis at the hours in question. I was there the last three weeks or so, and have spent 1 week of each month there visiting. The item is one I have bought before. That week alone I bought the substance in question three times around those suburbs.

It could have been Me, I admit that. But it wasn't. The fact is that the charge was not provable, the evidence was way to thin. It is like saying that you bought a block of ice at a shop. You buy ice in the area a lot. Ice was used in a crime 20 minutes walk away 45 minutes after you bought some. A day later you don't have ice (or substance in question) on you. That is the whole case. I kid you not! That's the case, I hold nothing back. Still, bail was refused each time and no trial went through.

The judges, magistrates, lawyers, prosecutors all knew what was going on and they did not care. They all communicate, and they all do what they are told by society because they are brainwashed whores who are beholden to society. Period. This gives us an important instructional moment in Forbidden Truth, where we see that the "rules" are only there to fulfill the agenda.

I was "remanded" during the whole process. This is simply a jailing. This gives the system the control it needs to use this unlawful procedure against you. They did not stop there. Regular drug-tests, cell-searches, drug searches, trashing My cell, taking Me out of My normal cell in solitary for "no reason" (That was the reason given on the form). Hiring of prisoners and staff to steal, damage, withhold legal documents and cause as many problems as they could to try and stop Me.

There was illegal confiscating of My legal defense documents that I had written, which were sent out of the prison to be analyzed. Illegal visits of police for illegal interviews over the same case I was remanded for. The Dept of Justice sponsored the prison staff to threaten Me, assault Me and harass Me to try and break Me.

Medical treatment and dental treatment was often refused and when I got medical, it was useless and sometimes abusive. I am the victim, no doubt, of a campaign of illegal oppression, throughout My whole life.

Conspiracy of the psychiatric staff and all other government employees to try and force Me to take specially rigged psychiatric exams with the sole objective of placing a "hospital order" on Me for indefinite imprisonment. There were over 9 attempts to force Me / trick Me / threaten Me / harass Me to take the rigged interview.

The chief judge Rozenes of the legal court even said that "he didn't like Me", that I was "his biggest critique", after admitting he had seen My alleged website. He was "biased against Me", that "It has been seen to that you will not be getting bail"(several times), that "We are busy. You will stay in custody a long, long time and you won't be getting bail. You can plead "guilty" any day you want, that is only a one day hearing and I will fit you in any time you want. But if you plead "not guilty", you will be waiting a long, long time."

He was true to his word. Almost two years later I still was "remanded" without a trial. Four times in a row the trial was refused, and each time this happened a new trial was set for 4 1/2 months time, except the last time where I pleaded guilty. The normal procedure is to keep the prisoner waiting in the cells each day until the court is ready to hear the trial. Each time bail was refused, and all bail and bail appeals refused. Each time chief judge Rozenes was the presiding judge, a statement was made re bail, not getting a trial, or both.

It did not matter which judge I got, it was always the same. All the lawyers were equally biased, because virtually all human being hate and loathe the Truth and it's messenger.

The "reasons" given for the delays were so ridiculous that it was made obvious that I was being screwed around. At the first trial-attempt, the "reason" given was the judge was feeling tired and was "not coming out of her chambers". This is despite her returning from annual leave one month or so before.

Well, as soon as My trial was adjourned due to no judge being "available" (By the way a trial is supposed to wait for a judge to become available without adjournment) the judge was instantly better again, and took a trial in the exact same court room that I was in shortly after. This trial was of equal length. I was still in the building when another prisoner's trial began. His trial was no bigger than Mine. I have the court documents to prove that. My barrister Christopher Dane QC was useless, he did nothing about it.

The second trial-date My barrister P.C. Dane QC spent a long time with Me in the cells trying to persuade Me one way or the other to plead guilty. I kept telling him to that I wanted to plead "not guilty". We then went into court a short time later . Dane then began talking to the court, and lied and said that I instructed him that I was pleading guilty. I immediately jumped up and told the court that he was told to plead not guilty, and I wanted a trial.

Chris Dane QC then came over and told Me in an aggressive manner that I "had to" plead guilty, or he would walk out of the court and refuse to represent Me. I told him the plead was still "not guilty".  He came over and started threatening Me to plead guilty again, and I said no. He said he refused to represent Me unless I pleaded guilty. I told him to correct himself (i.e. tell the judge that the plea was not-guilty), and continue with the trial. He simply picked up his papers and books and left the courtroom. Dane pocketed his extortionist and grossly inflated fee even though he was in court with Me only briefly and never did the work.

The judge then adjourned the case for another 4 months or so. Bail applications from this day forth were also refused.

Interestingly, I was informed that a witness who worked at the local K-Mart store, was told the day before the trial that she did not have to attend, even though she was required to attend the trial. I am also informed that this happened at trial #3.

At the third trial date, the excuse was that the judge "accidentally" filed for a hearing instead of a trial at the last trial adjournment, so the trial judge felt he could not proceed. Funny, I spoke to the judge the previous week via the video link-up and he stated over ten times, the date of the trial, that it was a trial, and that the trial would proceed for that date. I have those documents also. What an unfortunate "error". They make a lot of "errors" in My court cases, all which suit them perfectly.

The fourth trial attempt was another con-job. This time they did not have any witnesses ready either, and were using My need to have medical attention against Me. I represented Myself at this one. After an interview with the new crown prosecutor, he agreed to drop the other four "duplicate" charges, as they were phony.

The trial would proceed with only 1 charge. When the judge saw the presentment, he refused to honor it. He told the prosecutor that he thought the charges should be tried on all 5 original counts. A judge cannot instruct the prosecutor what his presentment and charges should be. The judge rang the prosecutors superiors, and the 5 presentment was changed. Again, there was talk of the trial not going ahead.

NOTE : The witnesses were for the purchase of the item, and required for the prosecution case. These witnesses could not be threatened or the result of bail refusal as I never denied the purchase and the police had the security camera footage the day I was arrested.

In the end, I was offered release on the day, signed in writing by the prosecutor, and agreed on by the judge in open court. I showed the judge the signed agreement from the crown that stated I would be released that day, and he agreed to abide by it if I plead guilty. In need of medical attention (My complaints about same were ignored), I had to take "the deal". I stated on the record I was not guilty, and I was pleading guilty solely because I was refused a trial and needed medical. I had already done more "time" than should be for the charge and circumstances, something a judge agreed upon at a previous hearing.

I was sentenced to a further unjust and undeserved 1 and a half years or so. Appeals were interfered with, and I was again sent to solitary and management units for the period during which I can lodge an appeal. My legal documents were all confiscated during this period.

So why did they do this? I was at one time suspected of hosting a Forbidden Truth website known as "The Bare Truth". No charges have ever been pursued over this website, in fact there was no charge that could be laid. So they just laid charges by proxy. That's all they need to do. In fact, the website was not evidence in the case against Me either.

They just wanted to lock Me up because they thought I ran that website. My barrister and other officials have even told Me so. They have threatened Me not to ever run such a website again. But here is a website for you slime-bags anyway. Here it is, I have nothing left thanks to you, I lost My home, I have no peace. So this website stays. I will NOT back down on any Forbidden Truth issue.

I ended up spending over 3 years in jail over this charge. They gave Me an extra 3 days in jail more than the sentence just to be nice. Well, I have a long memory, society. You all screwed Me. And I  remember. You broke the law. You never proved that I did in the case where I was denied a trial. Don't forget to check out the lawyers section after this for more details on lawyers such as Chris Dane QC.

A proven fit-up that sat too well with the magistrate, pig-thugs, citizen-slave witness-whores and My lawyers.

Magistrate Ian Grey and the invisible criminal charges.

Last word of Travis.

This page has shown how society and it's hired goons and societal whores are not interested in following the law and rules, but in achieving ends. I know of times that you all broke the law in order to persecute Me. I have been convicted of charges that cannot be made out. I have had cases where a suburban shopping center had to magically transform into a beach resort for Me to by guilty. The magistrate actually ruled that that is what happened. I have been denied trials.
Let that be a lesson of Forbidden Truth to all, including Me. Moreover, let that negatively reflect on society and how it has no legitimacy or honesty.


The Forbidden Truth is that society had absolutely no Truth-based legitimacy in even attempting to subject Me, it's created victim, to any form of moral judgment or punishment. The law and values of society have no Truth-based legitimacy. Your whole society and it's history has been and endless cycle of child-abuse, genocide, lies, myth, derangement and rejection of Truth.

You abuse your own kids. You pollute the planet. You go overseas and abuse and kill foreigners in racist attacks to soothe your enraged psychological states. You murder children trapped in your wombs via "abortion". The "law says that's OK" is your excuse. The law said so ...selectively said so. Who said why the law said so? I guess the importance of obeying the rules is unquestionable when you get what you all want. The law is nothing when it does not suit you.

There are others. These tactics, as well as using the psychiatric system of prisons to circumvent the right to a trial are being used by australian societal leaders today. Both legal and illegal tactics are used in their persecution of tortured victim-creations. The system has the power, right now, to lock up any citizen-slave it wants without a trial. That does not include the false confessions that follow beating up suspects. Planting evidence. Yet, what about those begging the police for protection they never receive? Where were these tactics then? They used them against Me, and I hurt no-one.