FTM - Atrocity Files

Cursory analysis of recent "The Age" newspaper article featuring Pru Goward.

Dateline : Friday 28th of May, 2010.

I came across an interesting article today in a mainstream newspaper that caught My sharp eye. It caught My attention because at first sight it seemed to reveal Truth not only in a mainstream media distribution, but by a fairly well-established member of the government. I knew I had to take up the challenge immediately. It will be interesting to also monitor not only this case, but the political career of Pru Goward.

The link to the article is below (Use the back arrow afterwards to return here) :

LINK TO NEWSPAPER ARTICLE.

Does this article reveal Forbidden Truth? Well, Pru actually touches on some shallow Truth, but I notice the critique is carefully narrowed to only apply to foreign acts and inplies by omission that australian society is fairly decent. Pru does seem to have some agenda over what she sees as helping the rights of females which seems to come from a resentment of the sexist and male-oriented society she is currently a victim-creation of. That is not meant to be a derogatory or otherwise suggestive remark against Pru, it is only My intention at this point to observe the weaknesses and failures in her delivery of somewhat narrow and shallow Truth.

Of course, My analysis below will show the real situation at hand.

Firstly, we must understand that the label "circumcision" is utterly lie-based, insane and malevolent. This act is an extreme act of child-abuse by literally committing a barbaric assault involving the torture and mutilation of a child's sexual organs that is condoned, sponsered and condoned by the child's primary care-taker. The reason why such a label is deployed is not only to aid the guilt-driven denial of societal child abuse, but also to societally sponsor this assault on children by pretending it is something other than assault and child abuse.

Lloyd DeMause did an excellent article on child abuse that featured sections on genital mutilation and you can access that at the Institute of Psychohistory website link on the Weblinks page.

Below we see an excerpt of one of his brilliant essays, and this is a real account from a girl who was the victim of such an act. It shows the trauma an impact of not only being terrified, abducted and maimed, but more noteworthy is the fact that her own primary caretaker was in fact a major and active participant :

"I was six years old that night when I lay in my bed, warm and peaceful...I felt something move under the blankets, something like a huge hand...another hand was clapped over my mouth to prevent me from screaming. They carried me to the bathroom...I remember...a rasping metallic sound which reminded me of the butcher when he used to sharpen his knife...My blood was frozen in my veins...my thighs had been pulled wide apart...I felt that the rasping knife or blade was heading straight down towards my throat. Then suddenly the sharp metallic edge seemed to drop between my thighs and there cut off a piece of flesh from my body. I screamed with pain despite the tight hand held over my mouth, for the pain was not just a pain, it was like a searing flame that went through my whole body. After a few moments, I saw a red pool of blood around my hips. I did not know what they had cut off from my body, and did not try to find out. I just wept, and called out to my mother for help. But the worst shock of all was when I looked around and found her standing by my side. Yes, it was her, I could not be mistaken, in flesh and blood, right in the midst of these strangers, talking to them and smiling at them." - From Lloyd DeMause's essay "The History of Child Abuse".

So, "female gentital mutilation" is more applicable, but I think the most Truth-based term would be along the lines of "societally sponsored child genital mutilation". To the sane and rational individual, this barbaric and utterly immoral form of societally-sponsered child abuse is obviously a completely illegitimate and malevolent practice. I am always saying how serious child abuse is in australia and western nations and this is another proof of that. Further, it also dovetails with what I have been saying about the toxic plague of religion. This religious ritual is nothing more than a smoke-screen for severe and insane child abuse.

The reason why society sponsers this act of child abuse is primary because it needs to provide outlets for the rage, hate, frustrations and sadistic desires of citizen-slaves, all the while creating insane excuses and smokescreens to create the delusion-based smokescreen that it is for some other mysterious "religious" purpose. Ha! All religions are utterly lie-based and insane anyway, and couldnever be used to justify or explain any act, let alone this level of child abuse. So, we have the poison-container motivation again.

However, there are other important and noteworthy reasons why society sponsers this malevolent act. It also promotes it's citizen-slaves into religion, and thus entraps them in these lies. Society knows that many citizen-slaves want to seriously abuse their children, but in such a way that it is both "socially acceptable" and deemed moral. This just adds to the scope of the perversity, immorality and insanity of this form of societally sponsored child abuse.

Evidence and analysis of societal sponsorship of child abuse via sex-organ mutilation in RANZCOG statement.

The newspaper article stated that (Quote) : "The Royal Australian New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) says the practice of "ritual nicks" could meet the cultural needs of some women and potentially save some people from drastic surgery." - from "The Age" newspaper.

This is so wafer-thin and blatent as to be a condonement of mutilating children's genitals right there. The notion that children can be "saved" from harm by literally mutilating and torturing their sex organs under the ritual of a lie-based and insane religion is utterly and completely insane, malevolent and absolutely demented. There is no such thing as "ritual" nicks, these are brutal mutilations of children's sexual organs using implements with the addition of religious ritualistic ceromony.

1. Exactly how can donning ridiculous religious garb and being in a church or medical clinic transform an assault on a child's genitals into something else? It simply cannot! No reason is ever given as, or could be ever given, as to how a ritual can change the facts of what child genital mutilation entails.

2. We also see a "culutral needs" argument. This label almost gives the game away. It is a societal need, still a choice, but a needy and desired choice to abuse children. Since society and culture sponsors this insane act of a child's gential mutilation, exactly how can "cultural needs" by used to argue what should be culturally and societally acceptable? I can't - that is circular justification. And that is if we ignore all the gigantic mountain of Truth-based and obvious evidence that proves that this practise is just a uttely diseased and malevolent assault on children combined with religious worship/indoctrination.

3. The claim above that "saving people from drastic surgery" could be legitimate is entirely insane and ridiculous. Any unneeded surgery that is not performed to cure or treat an illness or condition in the patient is drastic and unneccesary at the very least. The act of mutilating the childs sex organs for no legitimate reason is itself a serious form of abuse and harm, and thus the child is not being "saved" at all. He is being subjected to extreme abuse and nas absolutely zero chance of being saved precisely because of the "procedure".

Lets take another related RANZCOG quote from the article : "female circumcision .... has been known to leave some young girls scarred for life when not carried out in proper clinical facilities." Another lie-based statement detected by Seer Travis. Mutilating a child's sex organs is child abuse and is always a malevolent and damaging act regardless of the location of the assault takes place in. The argument that we should continue to societally sponser this form of child abuse in medical hospitals because it is "safer" is simply invalid and insane.

But there is still more from RANZCOG : secretary Gino Pecoraro said on their behalf : "the issue would be discussed at a women’s health meeting in June." and "We will need to start to think about [its introduction]" and "But we need to make sure we do not legitimise the ritualistic maiming of children."

There is nothing any sane and rational person needs to discuss on this issue! It's that simple. Like abortion, insane "womens rights" and "religious freedom" arguments will be used to attempt to create a strong enough delusion of decency that this form of child-abuse can become slightly more societally faucilitated and sponsored. Why do we "need" to think about this issue again? It is straight forward. Where is any legitimate need? There is none!

The last quote from RANZCOG really is the icing on the cake. How on earth is RANZCOG's obvious and overt support and sonsideration of further sponsoring he ritual mutilation of children's genitals not a form of legitimising child abuse acts? What happened to "ritual nick"? It is now "ritualistic maiming of children". So obviously RANZCOG knew all along what it was, even when it called it a "ritual nick". RANZCOG is clearly trying to legitimise the maiming of female children's sexual organs. Here RANZCOG is showing an example of a kind of collective societal guilt manifestation. It is trying to deny the very thing it is currently and actively pursuing! RANZCOG has absolutely no Truth-based legitimacty and an organization.

Other quotes dicussed

4. I also notice that only female genital mutilation was being discussed, and how Pru Goward never metioned both male genital mutilation and the Truth that child genital mutilation assaults are sponsered by australian society. The Truth is that all ages, sexes and species should be 100% free of societal gentital torture and mutilation programs. Why should only a certain sex be free of barbaric child abuse? There is no legitimate reason! Of course both sexes of children should be free of such extreme child-abuse. This focus on females only by Pru strongly indicates that Pru has a feminist agenda driven by internal feelings and beliefs in her True Reality against the rather sexist structure of her society. It just makes no sense otherwise, why else would you not be against such child abuse for both sexes?

5. Pru Goward correctly and courageously stated that female genital mutilation is child abuse. But what are her motives? What is her agenda? Is there sufficient factual data to reveal these things??? Unfortunately the answer is no, at this stage.
It is unusual for a politician or any beholden member of society to be able to and actually speak against child abuse. This is normally done to keep up the societal illusion of decency, and that could well be a motive in this case also. It should never be presumed that when a societal whore makes a Truth-like statement that it is sincere or aimed at protecting children. If it is, we can expect Pru's career to take a rather down-hill direction.

5b.Pru Goward also commented that parents should be prosecuted for acts of female genital mutilation. This is where a strong lie-based element element enters the equation. All parents who undertake acts of child abuse are tortured victim-creations of their society, and are only undertaking such acts because of the immense abuse, trauma, lies, myths, derangements, frustrations etc that socety imposed onto their True Realities. Society has absolutely no legitimate right nor business passing judgment or punishment onto them.

Society reated the abuse, it sponsered the parent's abuse, it sponsors the act of child gential mutilation, and most importantly society continues to sponsor and commit acts of child abuse, mass murder and promote the very insitutions and policies that sponsor and faucilitate these acts! We must never forget both the abused and abuser are proven tortured victim-creations of society.

Pru is acting not on her True Reality but as a societal agent when she makes calls for punishment of a citizen-slave. SHe is acting and speaking on behalf of her society.

Prosecuting is not just. The correct Truth-based and benelovent procudure would involve removing the child and banning the parent from ever taking care of a child ever again."

6. Lets take a look at another quote, this time from human rights member Elizabeth Broderick : "In my opinion female genital mutilation or female circumcision, whatever you want to call it, is violence against women, often against children and young women."

Not only do we see a dismissive and off-hand ignoring of the utterly insane "female circumcision" label, but we see again how only female circumcision is mentioned. She is specifically excluding other acts of child genital mutilation. We also see that she states that it is her "opinion" that it is a violent act. That is not strong enoughm not pure enough. That does not consitute Truth. It is a simple glaring fact that it is an act of violence. This could be a tactic of trying to make the issue sound as if there is, or even could be, any room to argue. Whether or not it is deliberate or unintended is unsure.

Proof of how insane and pro-child abuse society, and final word on the law.

The fact that mutilating children's genitals is even discussed and considered as a possible societal policy and/or law is evidence and proof of how insane, malevolent and completely supportive of child abuse australian society is.

These spokes-people from RANZCOG have absolutely no qualms or fears about openly, overtly and publically suggesting we should be mutilating children's gentitals in australia. Just think about it! It's absolutely proves just how pro-child abuse society really is. How illegal and societally sponsered are different.

Laws in australia against such malevolent child abuse are deliberately weak, ineffective and unenforced. This is to allow the assaults on children's genitial to continue, while keeping up a guise that society is against such acts. It s a fact that not a single female genital mutilation case has been successfully prosecuted, nor a male case.

Here is direct testimony from Pru Goward : "There is anecdotal evidence that it is occurring, doctors have brought it to me when I was commissioner, they raised to me that there were cases ... and when I said to them why aren’t they reporting them it was because they feel it wouldn’t stand it up in court."

"Doctors are anxious about taking on the family...." - Pru Goward.

So, not only is society and government aware such barbaric child abuse is occuring in australia, but they did not do anything about it. The Truth is that it would be just as easy, if not easier, to prosecute such acts of child abuse than most types of criminals cases because of the physical evidence, fianance and group-activity aspects of child genital mutilation. No, society is not pursuing these cases, simply because it does not want to pursue them.

To demonstrate just how overt and open such child abuse is in australian society, just run a Google search for "Is male circumsision common in australia in 2009?" This query brings up covert and blatent paid "subscribed" adverts aimed at societally decreed child-slave owners or "parents" for booking child abuse in the form of inflicting mutilation of children's sexual organs.

Another aspect is that the societal sponsorship of the mutilation of genitals is reserved only for children. No adult can decide that another adult must have his sex organs mutilated. This is an important point. There is ZERO chance you citizen-slaves would accept the exact same policy/"right" of one adult citizen-slave to decide that another adult must have his genitals mutilated. This proves beyond all doubt that australian societal citizen-slaves secretly believe that children are peices of owned property that are less important and worthy than adults. It also proves that you all support child abuse, because only when the exact same acts of abuse are inflicted against adults would you refuse to even entertain their very notion.

CONCLUSION : The Forbidden Truth here is that the ultra-diseased society of australia sponsers these extreme and utterly immoral and malevolent acts of child abuse as part of its fundamental operational core.

Media Stories - A look at recent comments on torturing and mutilating the genitals of children.

Cursory analysis of recent "The Age" newspaper article featuring Pru Goward.

Evidence and analysis of societal sponsorship of child abuse via sex-organ mutilation in RANZCOG statement.

Other quotes dicussed

Proof of how insane and pro-child abuse society, and final word on the law.