FTM - romantic love and marriage exposed!

WARNING You MUST read the disclaimer before viewing this website. If you have not read the disclaimer, you MUST click here NOW or Close your browser NOW.
	The Forbidden Truth on sex, love, "relationships", marriage and the harmful societal myth of romantic love
The issues on this page are all completely inter-twined. It is not possible to adequately reveal these Forbidden Truths without discussion all the aforementioned issues as a whole. This is because they all stem from the same basic lies, myths and human faults and derangements. This is actually a very important and fundamental subject to the Forbidden Truth philosopher. All philosophers and psychohistorians should devote a lot of time to the analysis of these issues and how society uses them to ensalve and break it's citizen-slaves. It really makes Me laugh at you fools when you think that having a "partner" or a "wife/husband" is some kind of achievement, how you delude yourselves that you love each other, that you believe in the ridiculous concept of "cheating". Then there are those who whine that society is not fair and complain based on the grounds that that has prevented them from "getting" the "partner" they want. Of course, this is a moot point and has no legitimate basis in Truth. Others actually complain that the societal institutions of "partners", family and marriage are not strong enough, that there are to many divorces, too much "cheating" going on. These fools are simply motivated by personal insecurity. Marriage and romantic love is no idle issue. These lie-based and invalid societal institutions are one of the most destructive and deranged of all and are responsible for extreme unhappiness, violence and mental derangement. The societal myths and lies that surround romantic love and marriage are responsible for causing murders, violence and misery on a massive scale. Further, these societal derangements are also one of the keys to understanding human behaviour and just how devious and malevolent your society really is. All the Forbidden Truth issues come together to fit perfectly, to form a big picture, just as the pieces in a jag-saw-puzzle do and thus this essay is of paramount importance to anyone seeking Truth.

(Right) Know that all four of these societal lies/myths are directly related : marriage, romantic love, family unit mythology and societal lies about sex. They all have a common malevolent and inter-related stratedgy and purpose. Embracement of even one of these societal lies is a betray of Self.

They are all co-ordinated attacks on your Self-Love, freedom and sanity. Each one of these lie-attacks is deliberately and malevolently designed to work together and re-inforce each other to deceive and destroy you.

The primary concept that has to be understood before we can destroy the lie of the perverse marriage ritual is how love works, and the perverse societal myth of romantic love. It is important to distinguish between love, self-love and romantic love. Love is a real, valuable and powerful emotion. Romantic love, however, is a fairy-tale ideal that simply does not exist.
All humans are born into this world with a feeling of esteem, self-worth and Self-Love. They think themselves the center of their world. A 2 year old goes through the so-called "terrible twos", where he simply expresses the natural born Self-Love and sense of importance and self-worth he still usually possess.

Truth is that societal institutions and parents acting on behalf of society act to quickly strip him of this natural, healthy and pure Self-Love. This is not just using the child as a poison-container. Society specifically instructs this exact form of poison-container attack against all new children to achieve it's malevolent and insane goal of breaking the child so it can continue to operate in the current lie-based and insane way it currently chooses to. If humans still possessed their natural Self-Love assets, society would not be able to control and brainwash it's new citizen-slaves to the extent that it currently does. Broken adult citizen-slaves are reminded, often subconsciously, how broken they have become and are nearly always keen to destroy the child's Self-Love that threatens to remind them of this Truth. Remember, loyal citizen-slaves hate and fear Truth, and don;t need much motivation to reflect their own childhood victimization upon their societally-decreed child-slave.
Via parents and other societal institutions society overtly commits a brutal campaign of spiritual rape against all new human children born into the society.

Society sets out and deliberately and malevolently destroy the Self-Love, the esteem of the children to help make them into broken sheepish citizen-slaves. Society's malevolent goal is to make you miserable, weak, broken, deranged, Truth-hating, obedient and slave-like.

(Right) We see a diagram showing the obvious advantages of Self-Love or narcissism. Self-Love is a natural asset and a skill that you can work on to be as emotionally self-sufficent as possible for you. Those who rely on external sources for their love are in danger when those sources become unavailable. The top series shows external love arrows. The bottom one shows the situation when external sources are not available. Relying on external love also makes the person vulnerable to emotional manipulations. Society malevolently demonizes Self-Love precisely because it is Truth-based, sane, and valuable and gives great independence from external societal forces. Societal leaders realize that if such Self-Love was possessed by a large percentage (say 30%) of citizen-slaves its power and corrupt regime would be at an end.
(Right) Likewise, any negative emotional or psychological state is best taken out on others. This is projecting these problems outwards at society. All outward projection is a form of Self-Loving activity because it appropriately places your welfare and well-being ahead of everyone else's. Society always tries to claim that it is moral or acceptable only to direct your negative feelings at yourself, to self-harm. This is an utterly lie-based, insane and malevolent proposal. It simply sacrifices yourself for another. It asks you to bear the stress, hurt, anxiety, or other negative state. Society does this to make you broken and docile so that it is easy to control and victimize you.
This societally-sponsored assault against you and your Self-Love begins in childhood and continues to the day you die. Nearly all loyal citizen-slaves do not and cannot love themselves. You have no freedom from society. You hate yourselves. We see this loss of Self-Love all the time in self-murder, labeled as "suicide", the need to get "drunk" via ingesting toxic and harmful liquids, self-harm including the perverse use of makeup, tattoos, piercing's and high heels as well as depression. Extreme speeding, life-endangering "extreme sports" are also manifestations of this utterly malevolent and insane societal instruction and conditioning. Once societal leaders have achieved their primary goal of destroying the Self-Love of their citizen-slaves, they are vulnerable to further societal myths designed to enslave, break and control them. Society then indoctrinates it's victim with a toxic myth (just like it did with the insane god myth) that a special kind of love, called "romantic love", exists. The Truth is that no such thing exists at all, and many tormented citizen-slaves spend their lives unhappy, frustrated and empty because they cannot get this nonexistent yet coveted societal pot of gold. So, society has created a void, and has planned to fill this void where Self-Love used to be with a delusion-based, un-obtainable yet addictive mythical love called romantic love. Society tells it's citizen-slaves and child-slaves that this romantic love can only be obtained by agreeing with and embracing certain societal institutions. Right here, we see an obvious societal control ploy. It is naive and ridiculous to believe that a fairy-tale love exists, and even more so to think that only by agreeing to be enslaved into a toxic societal lie-based institutions and cultural dictates can this be realized and cemented into place. Of course, there is nothing to be cemented into place for these hapless fools. In order to fully appreciate why, we must continue to examine how love works.
I have often said to people (regarding love) : Those who seek love do not have it. This is a Truth. Now, love exists. It is a powerful and nurturing emotion. Therefore, because of it's value, it must be utilized properly. Love needs to be directed inward, not outward, in order to selfishly and properly love oneself. Society always demonized and condemns the Self-Loving individual, simply because it wants to stamp out and discourage such acts of Superiority because they undermine and threaten their societal control over the broken minds of the citizen-slaves. Remember this Truth : "Those who cannot love themselves cannot love others". This is in fact a remarkable and profound statement of Truth. Indeed, those who have no love of self, cannot have any legitimate love for others, only a delusion of love. The individual who seeks romantic love from others is doing so because he or she cannot meet their own personal need for love. They cannot give it to themselves, they cannot love themselves, so they seek love from others. Sadly for you citizen-slaves, the other individual who is seeking your love is also doing so because they cannot love themselves. Neither party has any real esteem and Self-Love, and that is why they seek it from any would-be "partner". Therefore, it is hopeless to try and "team-up" and get married or have partners for the purpose of mutual love. You will just get mutual inability to love yourself. It is no different than those who can meet their own need for foods. Those with a full fridge and belly do not desperately go about seeking food from others, because they have plenty themselves. It is only the person without food, hungry, who seeks the food of others. And of course, when two hungry humans meet, they have no food for either of them. Same problem applies with romantic love. However, due to the Truth-hating condition of the mass of loyal citizen-slaves, you cannot ever bear to admit this Truth to yourselves. You pretend that you are loved, that you love your partner. You delude yourselves that you feel love so that your lie feels real to you. It may even seem real, but it is only a delusion. This brings about a further condition in human relationships : insecurity. The marriage ritual capitalizes on this insecure desperation by literally enslaving you to each other and trying to legally threaten and morally coerce each other into "staying together", lest you have to face the reality of your own existences. And you all line up for this! The fact that you resort to legally binding yourselves together proves that deep-down you really know at some level you are not able to love each other and stay together. But it is because you cannot love yourselves, and thus each other, that you feel so insecure that you need to try and delude yourselves that marriage legitimizes your predicament and force yourselves to stay together. Ha ha! It is interesting to note that when one partner confesses that they don't love the other, or that they want to never see the other again, that this statement is met with extreme emotion, and often violence. The reason why so much emotion is involved is because your delusional constructs that you build your lives around are becoming too thin. You are starting to see the Truth of how invalid and pathetic your lives are. If you read the newspapers, you will see that there are murders, violent assaults all the time when a so-called "breakup" occurs, and this violence is often societally sponsored and idolized. Shows such as "Jerry Springer" back violence when a partner "cheats" on another. You all support the deluded societal slave as he violently lashes out for being unwittingly shown the Truth. This again demonstrates your so-called love for each other - you want to threaten or assault the other to attempt to coerce them into staying with you in a toxic and unhealthy situation of mythical lies. How pathetic! Sometimes we see if one partner "breaks up", the other partner does not care (indifferent) and stays calm. This is very rare to actually happen, and even when it does most of the time one partner is faking. But sometimes it is genuine. This can be caused by one partner obtaining Self-Love and simply realizing the illegitimacy of the romantic love myth. The other one is actually even more upset and often offended at this revelation. They would actually rather that the other person was hurt and felt bad, they often then desire to inflict emotional harm upon their "ex". This shows us that the other person does not love, and never did have any legitimate love, for the other person. They don't care about them, they only selfishly wanted their emotional needs met. They are offended because they are faced with this Truth, even for a split-second. The Truth that romantic love is false is revealed. The societal lie during the so-called relationship was that she was "loved", and he acted that way, she deluded herself that she was loved. But when confronted with the clear case that he never did love her, she faces the Truth that her previous beliefs about romantic love were false, and her judgment of such matter is also corrupt and false. This is why she is so upset and offended in this type of case - because he (probably unwittingly) made her face simple Truth. And humans hate facing Truth, they run from Truth and spend their lives deluding themselves with societal lies. This is one reason why all marriage and cultural relationships simply do not work - cannot work. But there are other issues regarding marriage and relationships, but first we must learn the Truth about sex.

If you thought that this image is inherently related to sex, you are a victim of societal brainwashing.	The Truth about sex. What is sex? The common societal use of this words means to have intercourse with a partner of the opposite sex. However, this is not a Truth-based definition/concept of what sex is at all. A Truth-based definition of "sex" actually means to stimulate your genital organs in such a way as to experience, or try to experience, pleasure and/or release. That's a real and honest definition. Notice that there is no mention of other people. There is no attempt to dictate how sex is done or with whom (if anyone). Make this clear to yourselves : That although sex can be reproductive, it does not have to be reproductive. Most times, people have sex for pleasure or dominance and do not intend to pro-create at all and thus often use contraception. The whole notion that sex inherently involves pro-creation or other people is utterly ridiculous. Sure, it can involve those things. But in no way does it have to involve those things.
Sex is always solo act, even when you have sex with a partner it is still a solo act. Sex with a partner just uses the partner to provide the stimulus to your sex organs instead of your hand etc. There are no magical or mystical elements involved. It does not really matter what stimulates your sex organs - it's still sex. The Truth is that there is no direct or fundamental link between sex, love, friendship or other people at all! These are all separate things. They can be kept completely separate, or combined. But they are not fundamentally inter-related. You might as well suggest fax machines are related to sex. You can have sex while using a fax machine, but it's not fundamentally anything to do sex itself per se. It's the same thing to try and suggest sex and other people/friendship are somehow the same because they can be experienced at the same time. You might feel like combining sex and friendship - but they are still two different things. There is just no legitimate, sane and practical reason why sex, love and friendship should be sought together. This is all just another cunning and malevolent lie used by your societies against you. After breaking you and removing Self-Love, you are told that you can seek love in sex and so-called "relationships". This is just a ploy by society. The same principal works for understanding partner-based sex. Sex is fundamentally a solo and lone act/experience because sex just means to stimulate the genital organs. Therefore, masturbation is the most fundamental form of sex. All other forms of sex are still solo activities/experiences with other unnecessary elements added on. In other words, sexual intercourse with a partner is "masturbation" using the body of the partner to stimulate your genitals. Two types of sex. Below are the two primary categories of sex. Of course, there are millions of ways to have sex that fit into these categories and it is up to each individual to decide what is best for him or her, after careful analysis of the Forbidden Truths and dangers involved. The categories are : 1. Masturbation 2. Partner-based sex (NOTE : Partner-based sex is still just a solo sex act that uses other people to stimulate your genitals.) I use these terms above as concepts of two sex types. Partner-based sex with a member of the opposite sex is what your society wants you to do, and the more reliant and en-slaved you are to each other, the more society is pleased and sponsors such a "relationship". Conversely, society demonizes and tries to get all it's slaves to refrain from every single form and variation of masturbation. But there is another aspect to partner-based sex that is important, that was not examined in My Truth TV Series 3 "Sex options and the prostitute" video for reasons of brevity. There are some forms of partner-based sex that society does NOT promote, and some that society only promotes to a much lesser degree. Here is a list (top of list is most societally-sponsored by societal leaders and society): 1. Hetro-sexual sex with a marriage partner. 2. Hetro-sexual sex with a long-term girl/boy-friend / engaged. 3. Hetro-sexual sex with a casual single partner. 4. Hetro-sexual sex with any casual partner. 5. Gay/Non-hetro-sexual sex as long as it is with a permanent "life-partner". Not-sponsored, demonized less than below 6. Non-hetro-sexual sex with no long-term partner. Demonized 7. Individual who solely engages in masturbation with no partner or relationships ever / perma-virgin recluse Demonized Note :* Society also promotes hetro-sexual intercourse between the above over oral sex or any other variety of sex. There are millions of forms/ways to have sex, but not only does society specifically want to use sex to lock you into specific artificial, enslaving and toxic "relationships", but it also wants to fascistly dictate to you exactly how to have sex in these relationships. Society pressures and manipulates citizen-slaves into only using one or two specific forms of sex. This is pure fascism. It represents a loss of personal freedom and autonomy. Yes, the so-called "free" and autonomous australian (or other) societies use sex, or more specifically sex with fascist rules attached, like a carrot dangling in front of a donkey to addict the broken citizen-slaves to another broken citizen-slave for the purpose of slave-production and enslavement. The whole societal mythology of romantic love and sex was invented simply because societal leaders wanted to increase the number of citizen-slaves being born into society. They still want to maximize their slave-thralls and they know only sexual intercourse between two members of the opposite sex can lead to pro-creation. This is why society demonizes masturbation and non hetro-intercourse based sex and promotes and markets sexual intercourse between the sexes. Society and societal leaders use false ridicule, teasing, attaching false negativity to masturbation, false morality, alienating those who refuse to conform, as well as the insane god-myth indoctrinations to try and coerce and threaten all citizen-slaves to conform to their fascist, lie-based, malevolent and insane dictates. Society invents invalid and malevolently manipulative terms for sex acts it wants to promote or demonize. Ridiculous terms like "getting laid" and "having sex" all suggest "sex" is somehow to do with intercourse and other people. This is also the reason why society is always demonizing the "virgin". "Virgin" is another demonizing label used by society to make people feel bad because they have not had a certain and specific type of sex that society instructs them to have. Notice that only sexual intercourse with a partner can change the "virgin" label, where as having sex every day via masturbation does not stop you from being labeled a "virgin". In order to pressure individuals into having sexual intercourse, society instructs that all "virgins" of breeding age can be assaulted, mocked and ridiculed under the guise of bullying. Did you notice that I used the term "market" above? I used the term "markets" very deliberately and precisely. Society uses television, radio and even spreading myths and rumors in order to place hetro-sexual-intercourse sex on a pedestal as some kind of ultra-pleasureable and better sexual experience This is a total lie! For most people, intercourse is an awkward and inferior form of sex to masturbation. This is because it requires two people, and that they manipulate the genitals of the other using their genitals. It is much easier to do the job yourself, as you can feel the feedback instantly and control every aspect of your sex session. Of course, there are those who find sexual intercourse more rewarding, those who like specific forms of sex. The only time someone who wants sex would need hetro-sexual-intercourse is when they specifically intend to make a new human being life form. Masturbation is simply the most free, autonomous, cheap, easiest to control, convenient, safe and Superior choice. For most people, masturbation is the most pleasurable too, and the only reason in nearly all cases where it is not is because of guilt attached to it that the individual feels consciously or sub-consciously as a result of societal conditioning and brainwashing. The point is : If not for societal conditioning, marketing and brainwashing, vastly most people would prefer and almost exclusively use masturbation to satisfy their needs and desires. There are some who would prefer other types of sex regardless. There is no concrete and objective single "best" form of sex. However, society claims that hetro-sexual-intercourse is somehow the "best", legitimate and most pleasurable form of sex when this is not the case at all! There are many other ways to have sex with partners, of course. Society always markets hetro-intercourse, while demonizing all other forms in relation to how little chance they have of ending in pregnancies. Solo sex (masturbation) does not place the individual at risk of STDs, unwanted pregnancies and related societal dictates of being a "father" or "mother". Due to it's many benefits, solo sex is the usual choice of the Superior. Again, that is not to say that some people might find partner-based sex more pleasurable even without any societal conditioning or brainwashing. There is always some subjective preference in such matters. However, most people honestly can get more pleasure and satisfaction out of solo-sex than any other form and the major reason some people don't is because of societal brainwashing causing guilt, self-consciousness and other mental disturbances. The point here is that most people can be happy with solo-sex. Society tries to promote sexual intercourse between the sexes while demonizing masturbation as if some concrete standard exists that applies to all. What is more malevolently devious, societal leaders have attached further fascist dictates and consequences to having sex. This is that if you have sex in the way society instructs and promotes and create a new child, you are an instant slave to the family unit mythology! Society instantly forces the label of "father" or "mother" upon you based on your sex, and literally orders you that you are now part of a family whether you agree or like it or not. Society knows that any unwanted or unplanned pregnancies that will result of it's policies can be used to literally force and coerce you into being enslaved in the marriage and/or family unit mythology. Society will even use the fact that most citizen-slaves were subjected to societally-sponsored family-unit abuse to try and claim that anyone getting (or getting another) pregnant is "responsible" for the care of the new child by default, simply because they are the biological creators. Society uses the fact that most adults harbor hate towards child abusers due to their own victimization as a child to achieve this by announcing and demonizing anyone who refuses to obey society and enslave themselves to the family unit and/or marriage false-duty. It does this by overtly announcing that to rebel and refuse family unit societal dictates is somehow an act of extreme child-neglect/abuse. This is ridiculous! In no way does refusing to be enslaved into insane, lie-based and toxic societal institutions constitute child abuse. In fact, many children are abused precisely because they are lumped with a child they don't want, such as in the case of serial killer John Wayne Gacy's childhood terror as an unwanted child. Can you see how malevolent and devilish your societies and societal leaders are?? The goal of manipulating sex in this way is not just to create new baby to-be-citizen-slaves. It is also to enslave you and take away and freedom you might have left by fascistly ordering you to become a father/mother combo and raise the child under family unit mythology and pressure the two individual to become victims of the marriage ritual. This is the real and ultimate goal of society in promoting sexual intercourse.
The free availability of condoms and contraceptives. There is nothing at all wrong with condoms or any contraception that prevents sperm and egg meeting. I will deal with other types of contraception in the abortion essay. Now, some of you are probably thinking along the lines of "If society wants to maximize production of new citizen-slaves, why does it allow condoms to be sold"? Simply put, condoms result in more sexual intercourse and long-term slave-relationships! Yes, that's right. You can have hetro-intercourse more often with the condom. The condom does nothing to prevent such forms of sex at all! Society actually uses condoms to lure people into hetro-intercourse via false feelings of sexual safety. After having addicted you to hetro-intercourse, a new situation arises. Sexual intercourse with a condom is not as pleasurable or convenient as masturbation or un-protected forms of sex. But in order for the condom to come off, you must stick with the one partner loyally for a long time! This is actually perfect for societal leaders! They are getting you to have sexual intercourse with one single partner which is the optimum situation they desire. Of course, condoms break and sometimes people "cant wait" or "lose control" and end up having sexual intercourse without the condom anyway. These people might have masturbated or not had sex if there were no condoms. Sometimes "couples" decide to remove the condom because it is a nuisance or they agree to accept having a child that they might not have had if they had without a long term relationship. Condoms in no way hamper societal efforts to control and enslave you via sex dictates.
Ms Mountwell's chest is just a natural body part. Her breasts have no inherent link to sex, despite what society claims.	The sexulization of female humans and australian/western dress dictates. I will be proving here that various sexual attractiveness standards are not concrete and objective, but are invented by the society that you are en-slaved to. Any sane thinker will instantly can see that the patterns in the below examples cannot be mere co-incidence, but the result of societal brainwashing of female appearance standards. Australian society, for example, fascistly decrees that the breast area of a woman is sexualized, and that women must cover this area in public with a bra and usually another upper-body garment. Any human female who rejects this arbitrary and fascist dictate is immediately demonized by their society, and branded "mentally ill", "immoral" or a "criminal offender" and victimized.
Consider the completely different standards of these following societies, and how virtually every single citizen-slave in them conforms to the societal dictates. Co-incidence? No way. i. Mursi Tribe of africa : These humans are instructed by their society to place a stone in their mouth to stretch their bottom lip. This is appearance fascism by their society, as well as constituting a self-mutilation and a self-harm/hate exercise. ii. Matis Indians : Face paint and nose bones : In the Javari Valley (near the border of Peru with Brazil) the Matis Indians are all fascistly ordered to conform to appearance standards of their society by painting their faces and mutilating them. iii. Topless Himba Tribe of africa. This tribe allows women to be naked or top-less, but also fascistly decrees that other decoration and garb to be worn. But notice the contrast between this society and australian and most other societies. iv. The muslim burka : This fascist appearance decree is harmful to women. v. Australia : The bra and other dress standards. Australian female citizen-slaves are fascistly coerced into wearing a "bra" clothing because their society has arbitrarily declared that the breast must be covered in public at all times. This is insane and unnatural, and notice the opposite decree of Example iii. Virtually no female would go shopping or out in public during everyday activities without a garment covering her breasts in australia. This is not just a legal decree enforced by unjust punishment, but one enforced by the artificially conditioned conscious and moral/mental processes of the societal slave-victim. vi. Australia : The ear-ring and stud mutilations. These are one example of the equivalent of the "nose bones" example we saw in Example ii. So, each social standard is arbitrary and is invalid. It is not "relative to each society" or "culturally relative". These statements are designed to appeal to rebel thinkers, but are not at all correct because they suggest that the standards are still valid. There are not valid. Consider and analogy to the insane god myth. One point is that each culture has a different "god" creature that is the one and only one. Obviously, a culturally relative standard here does not make the insane god myth valid at all. It just presents another problem for the insane god myth, that cannot be surmounted. There needs to be a basis for these standards that is concrete and non-arbitrary, but there just is no such basis! Societal leaders just make them up! Take the dress or skirt. This is designed to make the female more naked around her sex organ proximity, in order to try and turn her into a sex object. Australian society claims to be free, but it literally orders all female children to attend school in a dress even though this clothing is often not suitable in cold weather and the girl might want to wear thick pants instead. The Truth is that such female dress dictates, such as wearing of a bra and the dress, is actually designed to render females into sex objects by society. Most western societies bombard males with the image of the so-called attractive woman and tell them she is a sexual object. Females are likewise expected to "doll themselves up" using make-up and other artificial and expensive products to meet the arbitrary and insane societal beauty standards, despite these products being harmful psychologically to women and the skin, and produced at the utterly immoral cost of the tortured deaths of millions of innocent animals prisoners in societally-approved animal prison experimentation centers.
The marketing of sex as a violent assault on women by society.
The extreme personal harm caused by societal sex/love dictates revealed. All relationships that involve obtaining partner-based sex on a longer-term basis with the same partner are artificial and lie-based. If you are living in a marriage or long-term partner-based relation you are living a lie. Not only is marriage against natural human biology, but the whole underlying reason why these toxic relations are sought is to literally lie-down and enslave both individuals to each other as both a sex-slave and to attempt to gain love. The twisted objective is to take away the freedom of both parties, and dictate that they can only have sex in specific ways with one specific partner. Of course, sooner or later, this becomes stale and boring. This is why there are so many videos, magazines and sex-toys being sold to "spice it up" - because it needs spicing up. Compare this to hiring and then watching a movie. Do you want the exact same movie each time, or would a new experience keep your interest in movies? Of course new adventures are going to be more exciting and interesting. The same can be said for long-term monogamous relationships that society promotes. Not only is this boring slavery used for the purpose of gaining a sex-slave for partner-based sex, but it is also equally about trying to delude each other that the couple are in love. BOTH partners have lost their own self-love, so they seek love from others. Neither can give the other True love, because neither has it. Therefore, they both delude each other that they are loved by the other. Of course, they are NOT in love. They only have the delusion of love.
It is often not realistic or even possible for those who need partner-based sex not to "cheat". What if Ms Mountwell came knocking?	They are trying to coerce and en-trap each as a slave because of their own selfish needs. The whole deranged institution of marriage comes with various legal threats attached to it. Getting married implies a threat and coercion. Couples often spy, ring and monitor each other all the time because they desperately want to know if one or the other is "cheating". The Truth is that the very concept of what constitutes "cheating" is lie-based and ridiculous. Staying with one single sex partner (for those who need partner-based sex or want to re-produce) un-natural and against human biological urges and programming. But there is simply nothing to cheat, because the entire concepts of marriage and romantic love are lie-based and have no legitimacy. In fact, many citizen-slaves will openly admit that if their spouse was to "cheat" they would literally murder or violently assault their so-called loved one! It is not caring or loving to try and threaten and order another being to adopt insane sexual and personal relations criteria for their life-time. They both choose to live under a constant threat of violence to try and threaten each other to maintain their delusional life-structure. This is utterly perverse and insane!
Such a situation is dangerous, harmful and driven by serious societally-sponsored mental delusions. Both parties must deny this Truth, however. They need to believe they are in love. Just the fact that the only reasons why anyone enters such a toxic and artificial relationship is because of both an inability to naturally love themselves and inability satisfy their own sexual needs proves that they are broken and suffering citizen-slaves. And this is when they have what they "want"! Of course, the emotional and psychological problems are magnified many times when the illusion of mutual love slips, or the other partner is lost (due to "break-up", car accident etc). The so-called "normal" citizen-slave then experiences this great delusion of loss because he/she can't get the type of sex he/she needs and is still broken and miserable. They don't even have their delusions of being loved to comfort them! This often leads to self-murder, self-harm, depression and all sorts of negative life situations and experiences The Superior, however, is constantly enjoying an optimal sex-life at all times of his/her life as they see personally fit. The Superior has love at all times, because the Superior can give love to him/herself.
A final analysis of the consequences of marriage on individuals and society at large.
Divorce, and the modern myth that the toxic strangle hold of marriage is declining. One aspect of marriage is the divorce. This is actually designed to increase and encourage marriage to take place by ensuring the victims of this ritual that they can now change their minds again later as part of the modern and civil society. Ha! Fools! The Truth is that not only does divorce not end marriage, but more importantly it does not end the desire for a partner due to the loss of proper Self-Love!! We often see hapless victims of marriage realize that something is wrong, and then divorce. They then continue that toxic relationship as an "ex". But they don't stop there...they often seek out a new partner, or even a new marriage! That is right, folks. They don't realize that the problem is that they cannot love themselves, that they should not need to attempt to defy their biology by limiting sexual activity to one other person. They search for another partner, laboring under the delusion that marriage itself is sound and somehow they just found the "wrong partner". This is the sad fate that those who reject Forbidden Truth face, avid readers. They simply don't have the self-sufficient Self-Love and ability to recognize Truth that We Superiors possess.


Prostitutes What are prostitutes? Prostitutes are human beings, usually females, who exchange sex for money, goods or services. There are no other common attributes shared by prostitutes. They may be religious, or not. Some are honest business people and others are swindlers. But these things are the same in any occupation. Prostitutes actually provide an important service in society, as they provide an out-let for sexual urges that might otherwise boil-over and result in violent attacks on others. Despite the benefits, society demonizes the use of prostitutes. Society invents demonizing labels for the sex-worker and his/her clients, and then attaches a negative connotation to said labels to help isolate and victimize prostitutes and their clients. This is not to suggest that prostitutes are anti-society Truth-seekers. In general, there is no significant difference in the recognition and embracement of Forbidden Truths between prostitutes and any other group of citizen-slaves. Generally speaking, prostitutes have a slightly higher tendency to reject the marriage ritual but this is still insignificant. The prostitute as a sex option One great option for individuals wanting partner-based sex is to simply hire a professional. You hire professionals all the time to clean, cut your hair, mind the kids, fix your teeth etc. Prostitutes are just exchanging services for money. The Truth is that there is nothing inherently wrong with this particular profession or choice to use a professional sex worker. Prostitutes are convenient, come with no personal hang-ups and are generally much better in the arts of pleasure. There is no need to spend hours or even days "courting". There is no problem with availability. The cost of prostitutes is a factor to consider, but regular dating at bars and restaurants is also costly and any long-term "girlfriend" can become far more costly in foods, presents, outings and even a new car. Prostitutes are also perfect for those who need regular partner-based sex and/or those who find it hard to convince someone to be their sex partner. Clearly, prostitutes offer many clear advantages over other partner-based forms of sex for many individuals. Another advantage is that generally speaking it is much, much less likely that sex with a prostitute will result in being enslaved to the engagement/marriage/girlfriend/family unit mythology. So this option represents less risk to any freedom you might have left than having a single "normal" partner. Of course, masturbation is still always the cheapest, safest choice and the choice of most Superiors. Society, however, chooses to malevolently demonize prostitutes and their clients for no sane and legitimate reason. Society does this in order to simply bolster and strengthen it's lie-based and invalid societal structures by doing so. Why are prostitutes persecuted? The primary reason why society chooses to persecute prostitutes and their clients is simply because they are violating the sacred family unit mythology, and of course violating the societal marriage single-partner institutions. Society fascistly imposes a dictate that it's citizen-slaves must select and stick with a single "partner" of the opposite sex, and not have sexual relations with other's partners. The very act of prostitution violates this perverse societal dictate. That does not mean that prostitutes all consciously reject these societal institutions, their business activities do this simply by the act. This is the primary reason why society chooses to culturally demonize prostitutes. Individuals may have additional or other grudges against sex workers on a personal basis, but the primary reason why sex workers as a group are hated and/or persecuted is that their business violates key societal dictates. Are prostitutes victimized more often because of vulnerability? No. Prostitutes are on average no more vulnerable than any other similar person. True, their job does present dangers that other don't face. But it also presents securities that others don't have. For example, prostitutes that work in a brothel have cameras, panic buttons and security bouncers at their disposal, where most other workers do not. Street workers usually have a "minder", and will often discretely write down any vehicle license plate number. They tend to more more perceptive and alert, and better able to fight off attacks and suffer less emotional harm than the average person. Further, prostitution areas are heavily monitored and unraveled by police on a regular basis. The serial killer in particular has problems targeting them, because he has to return to the same small area to select his victims, whereas killers such as Ted Bundy have areas the size of the entire state to look for their next target. All in all, prostitutes are harder targets for serial killers and like criminal individuals. If society was Truth-based and run by a Seer of Forbidden Truth as it should be, the feminization of prostitutes would cease and thus the dangers would evaporate immediately. Currently, all societal "efforts" in australia for prostitutes are for simply creating an illusion of decency. They are wafer-thin and designed to generally fail. Nearly all pig-thug monitoring and activity, for example, is largely designed to harass the worker and the client rather than provide proper protection. Society could easily provide much better facilities, such as shelters, cameras and nearby supervised day-room centers but it malevolently chooses not to do so because society wants prostitutes and their client to suffer hardships. The Truth is that prostitutes are targeted because of their profession by individuals who are venting hate, rage and frustrations they harbored against the prostitute. Often, an attacker of prostitutes has no personal grudge against them, but is acting as a living agent acting on behalf of his society. Society does not provide adequate protection to prostitutes. In several famous serial killer cases, such as the Green River Killer Gary Ridgway, police have undertaken lackluster investigations. In fact, cases such as Peter Sutcliffe have shown that as soon as a serial killer switches from targeting prostitutes to other humans, society immediately steps-up investigations, shows more concern and outrage than before and often catches the killer. If the victims were respected business men, Gary would certainly have been caught much sooner. When asked why he targeted prostitutes, Gary replied : "Because I hated them. And because I thought I could kill as many of them as I wanted and not get caught"...."I thought I was doing you guys a favor".
Bondage, BDSM and "mistresses". What is BDSM or B&D? According to society, bondage and discipline is an exotic form of sexual option that is practiced to enhance the act of partner-based sex. Is there any grain of Truth to this definition of BDSM? Absolutely none. There is not one iota of Truth in the above societal definition. Sex is an act that stimulates the genitals organs by friction or similar stimulus. Masturbation and sexual intercourse are both forms of sex. BDSM, however, is simply a form of legalized medieval torture and assault that has absolutely nothing to do with sex. A "mistress" who ties up their partner and then tortures them with various implements is simply an enraged individual who is using the "slave" as her poison container. A Truth-based definition of BDSM is : "A form of brutal abuse and torture, sponsored by most societies, where a tortured victim creation of extreme childhood abuse is allowed to legally bind or tie a victim for the purpose of relieving the immense frustration, anxiety and hate that they harbor via legal assaults and humiliations." Note carefully that there is no mention of sex in the Truth-based definition. Assault, torture and BDSM are all exactly the same actions. BDSM is an act of hate, rage and legal violent attack dressed up in ridiculous mysticism. Period. BDSM supporters always employ mysticism and ridiculous catch-phrases to hide the reality of what they are doing. Many mistresses are not even consciously aware of their motivations, and even what BDSM is. They just simply enjoy torturing their victims so much they come back and do it again. The reason why they enjoy it so much is because they are highly sadistic, and also they gain relief from the immense trauma and harm that resides in their True Reality from their childhoods. Terms such as "divine" torment are all made to appeal to the insane god myth and mysticism. Lets look at some of the smoke-screens used to deny and hide the Truth about BDSM : 1. Songs such as "pleasure and pain" by "The Divinyls". These musical and emotional appeals contain lyrics such as "What ever you done don't try to explain." and "You've done it once, you can do it again". This is simply telling you "Don't think about what is happening. Don't resort to reason or answering any legitimate inquiry or questions about what you are doing". This is the exact same thing that religions do. They do this because they know that their explanations are total rot and don't stand to even cursory logical analysis. 2. "We practice sane BDSM" or "We believe in sane BDSM". Ha! No act of BDSM by the "slave" is ever a sane and psychologically healthy choice. Ever. No mention of sanity was even brought into it, but there is a pre-emptive defense put up by most major BDSM businesses that using their services is "sane". This is so wafer-thin as to be ridiculous! Utterly ridiculous! Obviously, they feel as if their practice is not sane, that they need to defend against the possibility that someone will think they are insane. 3. There is some link between pleasure and pain. This is ridiculous! There is simply no scientific basis for this statement. Pleasure and pain are two completely separate emotions. They are in no way combinable. Yes, some "masochists" claim to derive pleasure from being assaulted and tortured. However, this is only because they are suffering from a societally-induced sickness because they hate themselves. They are either getting pleasure or pain. Not both. There is no "fine line" or mystical link between suffering intense pain and being pleasured. Society is guilty of an insane hypocrisy in demonizing killers who torture their victims, while sponsoring torture via BDSM. The consent factor. One thing that I have to dissect here is the societal notion that the participants, especially the victim or "slave", has given a consent or permission to be tortured and abused and thus such activity is different from other torture and should be allowed by society. This is an utter load of hog-wash and nothing more than a distracting smoke-screen by society. Firstly, no living being that was sane, mentally/emotionally/psychological healthy, and rational at the time in question would ever agree to allow an enraged and violent individual to render them helpless and subject them to severe pain and harm. The only reason some humans allow this is because they are guilty, or hate themselves, or both. Their rational thinking abilities and Self-Love are severely damaged or even destroyed by the brainwashing and life-time of abuse, stress and trauma foisted on them by society and thus they are in no fit mental state to make any such decisions. No individual who was in a Truth-based and bone-fide sane, self-loving and rational state would ever allow another person to tie them up, let alone torture them. It's that simple. By giving "consent", the individual proves that they are not fit to give consent and thus their consent is null and void. Secondly, The acts of BDSM are still exactly the same. Regardless of any "consent" or otherwise, it is an act of violence assault and torture. The only reason anyone would choose to torture someone is because they are deeply enraged and require the use of a poison container to assuage and purge their negatively experienced emotional state. It is still the same act, the intent and purpose is still exactly the same. It makes not one iota of difference if consent is forthcoming or not. Society allows BDSM torture because it knows that it re-directs violent and often murderous-level rage away from targets that are important societal leaders and the running of their empire. The assaults follow carefully constructed rules that allow torture in such a way as to ensure that the aggressor achieves their need/desire to severely torture and assault a human being, while not damaging the victim or "slave" enough to render them unable to work and pay taxes, etc. BDSM serves the same purpose as abortion does for societal leaders and society. It is marketed and directed at females, just as abortion is marketed and directed at females. Yes, males sometimes become "masters". But the gender-bias is strongly towards BDSM being for females. It generally caters to those females who want to carry out non-lethal violent acts, whereas abortion is designed to cater for females wanting to carry out lethal violent acts. It also serves the purpose of breaking Self-Love and uphold the insane and perverse societal decree that suffering must be directed inward. This might seem a bit odd at first, so let Me explain. So-called "slaves" are clearly self-hating individuals. They are allowing and even seeking out and paying for abuse, often under self-delusions of sexual activity. They hate themselves. They clearly are directing punishment inwards, they clearly are broken by society. The mistress, however, is directing her problems outwardly, onto others. Firstly, most mistresses will "switch", which means that they will willfully choose to be tortured when it is their "turn". This is absolutely perverse! But this "switching" aside, every act of a mistress directing outward is coupled and balanced with someone directing pain and harm inward against themselves. So the net gain for society is that people are victimizing themselves. Societal leaders know that many highly-victimized females would become violent criminals or even murderers if they did not have the "mistress"/BDSM torture outlet for their rage. In fact, many mistresses are so angry they could easily torture a human being to death. This is why society supports such acts of assault and torture. Do take note that society has invented a smokescreen of sexual activity around BDSM. It also has deployed the air-of-mystery or the mystical fog around BDSM. Every thing that has such mysticism is a lie or myth, and this mysticism is used simply as a smoke-screen to deny rational analysis. The mistress sometimes know on a conscious level that she is an enraged societal victim using and hiding behind BDSM to commit acts of torture and assault that would otherwise land her in jail for a long time. These mistresses are never "switches". In this case, they are properly directing any hate and frustration outwards in a demonstration of Self-Love and thus acting appropriately. This type of mistress is the only BDSM participant that is demonstrating sane, healthy and Self-Loving behavior. The slave is always the most inferior and self-hating of any BDSM participant. Sadly, though, most of even these types of mistresses engage in other types of self-hating and self-abusing behaviour such as the wearing of high-heel boots, drinking of alcohol etc. Society's support of BDSM has no Truth-based legitimacy, because it is allowing the deliberate torture and destruction of the Self-Love of victims of society. It is a total hypocrisy that serial killers and other forms of torture are demonized and their practitioners unjustly jailed and condemned, while BDSM and other forms of societally-sponsored abuse and torture are allowed on a daily basis. Of course, virtually all practitioners of BDSM have to desperately deny this Truth to themselves. They will get upset, angry or offended quickly at hearing these Truths, simply because this page does represent Truth.

The Forbidden Truth on sex, love, "relationships", marriage and the harmful societal myth of romantic love

The Truth about sex.

The free availability of condoms and contraceptives.

The sexulization of female humans and australian/western dress dictates.

The marketing of sex as a violent assault on women by society.

The extreme personal harm caused by societal sex/love dictates revealed.

A final analysis of the consequences of marriage on individuals and society at large.

Divorce, and the modern myth that the toxic strangle hold of marriage is declining.

Prostitutes

Bondage, BDSM and "mistresses".