Animal Abuse and Sports Truths

WARNING You MUST read the disclaimer before viewing this website. If you have not read the disclaimer, you MUST click here NOW or Close your browser NOW.
Animals, sports and surrogate activities This page examine the following issues and reveal the related Forbidden Truths : 1. The effect that humans have had on animals and the natural world and associated philosophical concepts. 2. The Truth-based position of the human species compared with other species. 3. The societal decrees regarding non-human species and the genocide of certain species of animals by society. 4. I will examine the various ways that animals are murdered via hunting and the mass food production system. 5. Domestic pets, and the Truth on australia's RSPCA so-called animal protection agency. 6. Introduction to the toxic ritual of team sports such as soccer and surrogate activities such as solitary darts. 7. Finialize with a look at all these issues at play in fishing, hunting and bullfighting animals torture/murder societally sponsored activities. Note : Although humans are animals, I will just use the term animals for non-humans and humans for humans throughout this essay.
Humans are a faulty, diseased and inferior species of life. The reasons for this are revealed in the Devolution essay. Humanity is responsible for the extinction of many, many species including the **** and quite probably even the Dodo. Humans have interfered with the natural development and evolution of many species directly, and all species of life indirectly. Examples of this are the breeding of cattle and show-dogs using artificial selection that has produced crippled and dysfunctional "breeds". Humans imprison and genocidally murder species such as the chicken race and the tuna fish. They pollute the environment including coral reefs that will one day render this planet un-inhabitable. Humans even have endangered their own species not only via pollution but also war and many other ways, and thus are a clear and present danger to all species of life on planet earth. Humans subject their race to un-natural and Truth-rejecting life-style paths and dictates, they systematically abuse and dement their offspring and believe in ridiculous mystical powers that are the result of wide-spread and serious mental dysfunction. All these actions are un-natural and the result of extreme mental disease in the human race. These actions alone prove to any sane thinker that humanity is the lowest and most unstable species of life on the planet, and if there has to be any species that deserves to become extinct, it is certainly humanity.
Society refuses to face up to this Truth. Human societies spread the insane lie that humans are somehow better and more important than animals. Society uses catch-phrases like "humans are at the top of the food chain". Of course, humans are the lowest and most unstable of all species on this planet. However, all societies deny this Truth as part of their fundamental operational core. Societal leaders know that animals show-up humanity and human society. This combines with human immaturity and it's "tall-poppy syndrome" to make humans try and pretend that it is the animals that have the sad and broken existence. But it is the citizen-slaves who have the sad and broken life experience. Societal leaders know they have to appeal to the foibles of humanity to be popular and maintain power. The reason why society encourages the lie that humans are better than other animals is because animals are generally worthless to their fascist schemes, and humanity is so insecure that it wants to delude itself it is better than it's Superiors. Animals, such as deer, are actually more advanced in evolution than humans are. Normally, each species alive at the same time has a roughly equal evolution period behind it, because they came from a common anscestor. Some animals just developed different but equally valid changes, such as wings or flippers, but they all have the same evolutionary time. However, human beings differ in one important way that seperates them from other animals. This is : Humans are are the only life-form on Earth that lives a lie and suffers from extreme fundamental brain malfunction. Humans live a lie. This what makes other animals Superior, and humans inferior. Therefore, humans have not been able to mentally progress, and in fact have been devolving. That makes humans on the absolute bottom of the pile. The Truth is that human beings are simply sick animals. They are the most inferior type of animals. As we know, humans can develop inferiority complexes, something that wild animals never suffer from, as they have not lost brain function integrity. Humans, in general, have an inferiority complex that makes them sensitive about this issue, and this can often render humans hostile towards animals. But due to the human disease of Truth-denial, humans can never admit to this. Many humans even like to delude themselves that they as not animals and incorrectly reject evolution. Evolution or not, most humans wrongly think that they are superior to animals. Both of these are rejections of the Truth. Society brainwashes them to n associate animals with being a lesser thing, and with violence. One example of this is : When a judge, representing human society, sentences a serial killer, he refers to this hated and despised criminal-victim thus : "You acted like an animal." OR "You are an animal", to infer some kind of negativity that the killer supposedly has. The vast majority of humans try not to be like the other animals, they don't want to act and think like an animal. There IS a guilt factor at play here. Human society sponsors and faucilitiates torture, genocide, murder, victimize and otherwise brutally and unnaturally exploit all the other animals. This ability does NOT make humans Superior, it proves thier inferiority because only a species with a mental-complex needs to do these things. Human society finds it easier to create an illusion of sanity and righteousness in its animal genocide if it can somehow seperate humans from animals and deny the Truth that humans are the lowest form of animal life on planet Earth. So human society has to make various disguises for its hostility towards animals. Usually, this hostility is subconscious. It can take on many varing levels of intensity, but is commonly an extreme hate or rage with murderous intent. This is not to say that this is the only reason why humans hate and despise animals. But it is the major basis for most of the other reasons. This irrational hate and hostility manifests itself in the ways that human species has a direct and overt toxic and destructive impact on every single other species of life. This Truth proves that humanity does not even deserve to continue to exist, because its continued existance will result in the further extintion of many other Superior species of life. (This will also be discussed further in the RSPCA section). As part of this invalid and malevolent process, societies declare all animals to be sub-human, and are denied all legitimate rights. Animals are declared by society to be slaves to the human race with no inherant value as a species or as individual members thereof. This is an arbitrary dictate that has no legitimate basis in Truth. Certain species are further demonized as "evil" or "viscious" species, where humanity and society is projecting it's faults onto other species again. Animals are thus treated by human society in a completely immoral and unjust manner. This includes the daily genocide of victimized species and this is just considered to be a normal everyday and un-noteworthy event in society. This includes australian society declaring that the chicken race is able to be imprisoned and then brutally murdered en-masse. It malevolently and wrongly claims the chicken race is worthless and inferior. It declares any species or individual member thereof to be fodder for society, except for specific cases in a narrow and limited way that provides a specific slave-function to society. For example : A pig-thug tracking-slave dog cannot be murdered because it is being used for a purpose by society. A wolf in the wild can be murdered because it is not being used as a slave by society. This is despite the actions being exactly the same in both cases, and where there is no difference between the two species that gives them any more or less credence or legitimacy as a species. Of course, that does not suggest that a domensticaed dog lives better than a wolf at all. It just shows how and why soicety makes it's invalid decrees. Regardless of any invalid "status" society imparts on certain cases as seen above, society declares animals are all less than human. Even lesser in value than it decrees human children to be. This is society's attitude towards wild and domesticated animals. Proof of this is in society's lie-based family unit structure. In a family, a dog is decreed by society to be at the bottom, the least valuable member of the family. If the dog somehow uses it's natural ability to "rule the roost", society would perversely demand, using various methods, that the "order" be restored to that particular family even resorting to outright murder of the dog. It is the same for any species of non-human animal living in a family unit. We can glean a lot of Truth about humanity and society from observing it's treatment of animals. We can judge a societies intent and level of malice by how severely it commits atrocities and genocide against animals that are harmless and innocent. One of the most blatant and widespread is the mass-exploitation and genocide of the Superior chicken race. Chickens are more valid and advanced than humans, because they do not suffer the mental defects and derangements that humans do. Yet, chickens are murdered in their millions every day by society. This is no big secret, I hear you say. And you are right, because it does not have to be. Society is just that overt and blatant in this particular mass-murder activity. Like war and abortion, however, society has illegitimately modified what the meaning of it's actions entail. Instead of admitting that it immorally murders millions of chickens, society simply scoffs and suggests it humanely "ends" their lives to provide food for humans and claims this is a perfectly benelovent and moral activity. Society attempts to claim that it "has to" murder the chickens, but that is also a total lie.
	Another species that is tortured and victimized by australian society is the lobster species. This is not just because lobsters can be eaten. No, it is because humans want the lobsters on display in restruants, so they can delude themselves they are superior to the lobsters. They also want to cruelly imprison the lobsters, and murder them in a very brutal and torturous manner so they can sadistically enjoy that and/or again make themselves feel legitimate and superior. Of course, the fact that they need to do this highlights that they secretly feel inferior and insecure. Society can only get away with such overt and blatant genocide and exploitation of Superior life-forms because the bulk of the citizen-slaves support what society is doing to animals and believe that humans are numero uno, a concept that is utterly false and ridiculous. Despite any verbal protests they make to keep up their illusions of decency, their actions speak louder than their words.
Society also makes simular dictates over animals such as cows, pigs and other species. {I will cut-in to briefly mention now something that will be discussed in detail in My upcoming Self-Love essay: that the vegan and vegetarian diets system does NOT represent Truth. This is a societal trap devised to get you to betray yourself and harm yourself via depriving yourself of diet components. More importantly, it is a malevolent and lie-based way of reversing the guilt and blame society bears for it's treatment of animals onto the individual.} Despite that societal trap, society hypocritically dictates the lie that humans are Superior to animals. Society does not allow it's citizen-slave to defy this dictate, using false morality and false ridicule alongside laws to enforce these invalid and malevolent decrees. Take this scenario : if two life forms were drowning, and you could only save only one. What would your society say about that? Well, lets assume you live in a western society. This is not to suggest that non-western societies are not lie-based and animal-abusing/exploiting - they most certainly are but I need to make an example. Imagine a domestic dog drowning and a spider drowning. Your society would expect you to save the dog over the spider. If a human and a rat was drowning, society would be even more adament - it would certainly want you to save the human over the rat. Why is this? The primary reason is that a dog may be of value as a slave to human society (as a pet or working dog), where as a spider is usually not a slave or poison-container. A dog might be more malleable to the needs and abuses of society, where a spider is not. Also, a spider has been incorrectly and unjustly demonized and associated with "evil", because it cannot be made to mimic human behavior and appearance nor be used by society like pigs and dogs can and partly because it can hurt a human and is thus feared. Despite this fear, spiders are much less dangerous to humans than humans are to spiders and other humans. Just because a spider is not able to be shaped and controlled by society or have any appeal to society (both due to appearance and behaviour) , it is decreed by society that a spider is of less importance than a dog. The same general principals apply to the human/rat case. It is important, though, to realize that society would be quite unconcerned if you made no attempt to save either the spider or the dog. This is because you are a human, and thus society considers that you have no obligation to save a non-human. However, society would claim that you "should" have saved the human over the rat. Society even goes as far to claim that it would be immoral to save the animal over the human, which is false and ridiculous. It would try anything it could to try and label any other choice as "wrong", and employ false ridicule. The Forbidden Truth is that the animal generally deserves to be saved over the human, not only because the animal is morally Superior to the human and does not have impaired mental function, but also because the animal is not part of human society and has never been responsible for your personal victimization by society. In Truth, no life form is obligated to save either the dog or spider or human. It is none of society's business. That is the Truth. If there was no risk or inconvenience to Myself, I would certainly save the animal, but that is just My personal choice. However, risking your one and precious life for the animal, let alone the human, is an immoral and inferior action and a betrayal of Self and Truth. Yet society would frown very heavily upon you if you did not save the human over the rat, in fact you would be unjustly persecuted for this. This occurs not because of concern for the individual, as society deliberately en-slaves, breaks and murders it's own citizen-slaves and children en-masse. It primarily happens because such an act shows disregard for humanity itself, and regard for an animal species in defiance of societal dictates. This sets of the inferiority complex of humanity. All these societal decrees and attitudes are perverse and do not have any legitimacy in Truth. The Forbidden Truth states that humans are the most inferior species of life on planet Earth. What a human thinks and judges of a creature is of no importance to the Truth. This is because there can be no concrete and universal standard as to what is more important. For example, a hawk sees it's prey as food, and the prey sees the hawk as a threat. The Forbidden Truth is that all animals are equally deserving and undeserving to be saved, and if there was any Truth-based preference it would be aginast the human being only. Why? This is because humans are diseased and inferior as a species and the human will do more harm and damage to other life forms and the environment via artificial means than any other species ever possibly could.

This duck is just going about its business. It is not a insane human, spouting insane ideologies and fascistly imposing insane and hypocritical behavioural standards on other life forms. Animals are Superior in nature to humans, as they do not share the genetic mental defects of humans, and are also not brainwashed and conditioned against their natures via toxic lies and myths. As long as an animal is "wild", for want of a better term, it lives its life based on Truth.

However, animals that have regular contact with humans may have their integrity slightly comprimised.

Animals are morally Superior to humans, do not pollute or destroy thier own envirnment, or commit acts of genocide. They do not invent facist rules and try to enfore those insane rules on other members of thier species.


	We now move onto domestication of animals for pets, breeding, dog shows and RSPCA Truths. Note : RSPCA is the australian version of the societal animal body, but it will apply to any major society overseas.
Human society has chosen to domesticate certain species for it's own needs. However, this process is a perverse, unnatural and utterly deranged practice that has no legitimacy and causes severe hardships and problems for the animal species that are domesticated. Make no mistake, this is a curse to any animal as a species or as an individual. Perverse behavioural standards are dictated to these animal-victims, as well as violent abuses including things such as hitting, and mutilation of genitals under the insane guises such as health. No other species meddles in evolution and natural selection, and humans only do so because they are arrogant, perverse and diseased. None of the changes made by humans to wild species are legitimate or for the benefit of the species. It is committed solely for malevolent purposes or to suit some invalid and deranged human need or preference that was created by human societies. One such need is the need for company and a feeling of being loved that most humans have due to the loss of their own Self-Love that was malevolently inflicted upom them by their society. Hence the invention of domestic pets by humans. Of course, there are other secondary reasons why someone will have a pet in addition to the primary one of a need of company. All these domestications all constitute an utterly invalid attack on the integrity of other species, and this is also to do with humanity's deep-seated insecurity over it's diseased condition. However, this is nothing compared with the utterly insane and invalid breeding and dog show abuses of animals. This issue was actually covered in Seer Travis' Truth TV Series 1 Episode 15. To overview certain breeds of certain species, usually dogs, cats and birds are artifically selected for breeding in order to produce un-natural and unhealthy animals. They are then paraded around an arena for the amusement of humans to be mocked and judged by perverse physical appearance standards that are nothing to do with health and integrity of the species, but perverse human appearance standards. This is all sponsored and promoted by the RSPCA. Discussion of RSPCA and how it supports and sponsors animal abuse and genocide : A discussion on how the various official animal protection agencies of societies are designed to promote and faucilitate and falsely legitimize the torture an genocide of animals. What is the RSPCA? According to society, it is a "Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals". Is this an accurate and Truth-based definition? Absolutely not. Why? [1] RSPCA supports the myth that all societies are based on the lie that humans are superior to animals and have more right than any animal does. [2] RSPCA promotes and supports society in all official animal abuse and genocide activities. [3] RSPCA supports society committing genocide against Superior races such as chickens. [4] The RSPCA is directly responsible for murdering Superior life-forms every day. I will start off with this latter example of why RSPCA is lie-based because reasons 1-3 were explained elsewhere. Here are two examples to support [4]. [4] (1) The unjustifiable murder of "homeless" or "lost" animals, using the insane and lie-based terminology of "putting to sleep" or "putting down". Why is it unjustifiable? Because the animal has not done anything to warrant being murdered. The idea that it is "homeless", and therefore deserves to die, is insane. Dogs and most animals are naturally homeless. Therefore, there can be no obligation on any animal from human society to have a home. Although they may in some cases keep the animals for a short period of time, it often transpires that the animals is brutally murdered by RSPCA. The RSPCA will try and say that it "has to" kill the animal, because it has nowhere to go. Who says it has nowhere to go? Who says it has to go anywhere from where it is now? Even if it did have nowhere to go, thats hardly reason to murder it. It's a false dictomy. It makes no sense. Another argument is that the animal would not survive if it was "released", and must therefore die. This argument is insane. The animal has zero chance of survival if it is murdered by RSPCA. Any chance is better than zero chance, and there is always a chance of survival no matter how small it may be. This is another way that re-incarnation and the god myth, being malevolent and immoral, manifests itself. They make the insane claim that "Oh, but it will come back and have a better life" and "We are doing it a favour". There is no evidence to support or even suggest that this insane theory is True. It is not Truth, it is a lie, and all lies are malevolent. RSPCA would not suggest tsuch afterlife scenario delusions justify killing humans, so why animals? The animals could be driven elsewhere and let go, in a nature reserve or a special island, or kept at society's expense etc. Because it could do otherwise, it cannot claim that it "has to" murder the animal. yet society still chooses to do this!!! Society overtly gives the legal permission for these employees to murder animals, partly because they believe that humans somehow own and have right over animals and must protect the order of society, and partly because society knows unless they take their murderous intent out on animals, they might take it out on humans. Society is allowing animals to be murdered as poison containers and RSPCA is faucilitating and sponsoring this. [4] (2) The support of "humane" treatment of animals, such as the exploitation and genocide of chickens. The RSPCA promotes and supports the humane caging and genocide of chickens for unnatural food support levels for human society. By setting an acceptable and humane standards for these atrocities, the RSPCA is actually is saying "It's OK to do so. Please continue, you meet the humane standards." And indeed, they do meet the humane standards. The key word being humane. Only humans commit genocide, eat animals that are not part of thier natural diet, unnecesarily torture and kill other life forms....breed millions of other life forms in cages for thier whole lives based on race etc. etc. etc. The environment chickens are kept in is also outrageous and immoral, but sponsored by the RSPCA and society. Chickens are kept in one of two malevolent and invalid catagories of horrific conditions, namely cage and free-range. Insanely, the RSPCA and society uses one invalid catagory as a measure for the other, when the Truth is that both catagories are horrific and unjustifiable. To be humane towards animals means to be cruel, commit murder and genocide against them, force them to live a life against nature, mutilate thier genitals, subject them to artificial breeding etc. etc. So a Truth-based name for the RSPCA would be : Fascist Organisation of Societal Animal Genocide and Brutalization Support, or the FOSAGaBS. What is a poison container? Click the link here to access the definition of this term. DO NOT READ BELOW UNLESS YOU UNDERSTAND ABOUT POISON CONTAINERS. As mentioned earlier, humans are animals but often deny this Truth. Humans are inferior, and suffer from inferiority complexes towards animals that often sees them manifest that via violent attacks and murders. First, lets look at some of the methods used by society and sponsored further by the RSPCA wing of human society to harm animals, and how they prove that humanity is using the animal as a societally sponsered poison container : Logical Principal {L1} : Like the insane god myth, society claims that you have to disprove its actions/claims wrong or they are by default correct. This is a backhanded negation and has no legitimacy. Society is making claims it has some important reason for committing murders, then starts committing unnatural and violent murder actions based on those claims (such as seen with the so-called homeless shelter system). So, it is important to understand that since humanity has committed an action, there must be some legitimate reason, explanation and justification as to why it did so already known beforehand, because a violent action was performed. This explanation must be able to stand to all logical analysis. If there is a reason, justification or statement of purpose given by human society, and that is proven false, then this situation is the same as not having any reason or justification, because it was proven to be false. If there is no reason, then the default motive for violent acts of murder is emotional and/or psychological. -2a The overeating of other animals beyond all natural and necessary requirements. -2b The unnatural breeding, domestication and mutilation of the genitals of animals using the insane label "desexing", which is actually both a sub-conscious attempt to stop the animals from being able to breed because you hate them, and a sub-conscience or conscious desire to inflict a violent and abusive atrocity upon animals. -2c The "sport" of hunting animals down and murdering animals for no other reason than the human wanted to kill something. -2d The physical and emotional abuse of domestic and wild animals. ie. using them as poison-container, where there is no other need or purpose to attack the animal. -2e The murder of animals where there is no clearly no legitimate need or purpose to murder the animal such as with the so-called dog-shelter system. The Truth is that the only logical and reasonable explanation for the above in view of {L1} is that humanity is using the animals as poison containers in addition to any other need or reason motivation. Let Me explain this Truth in each case: OK. Let Me apply {L1} to [2a] and start from there : [2a]: Humans overeat, and eat when they are not hungry. Although this is an exploitation of animals, is unnatural, and often has it's roots founded in self-esteem and other effects of the human mental defects, it only proves the callousness of defectiveness of humans on an individual basis. Does this explain the exploitation and genocide levels against chickens and other species? NO! Humans could feed themselves on other food and protein sources and still be healthy, and further more, even if they did eat chickens etc., they could do so to a much, much lesser degree than is currently the case. They do not have to do so as a society, they choose to do so, and they want to do so. Since society and RSPCA actively sponsers and promotes these various acts of genocide, and there is no sane, rational, natural or instinctual purpose to such massive genocide and over-eating and over-supply, the motivation of the poison container and human need to feel better about themselves comes into play. [2B]: Very easy one here. Humans are doing these things to mutilate the genitals of animals, in such a way that they themselves do not find acceptable to be done to themselvesm or is reflective of their own genitial mutilation experiance. They do this because they believe that they are "superior" and have the right to inflict this harm onto an animal, and the act of doing so allows the expression of this mental attitude. Also, they revell in thier presumed authority to do so, to inflict harm upon an animal, to watch it inspect its genital region afterwards to see what is wrong. The animals has done nothing wrong, nothing to deserve this. It robs them of thier natural life cycle choices, and asaults them with callous and malevolent intent. The reason given by society is : "we have to do it, we have no choice because we have to protect our animals by reducing numbers". This makes no sense what-so-ever! The Truth is that by the very act of harming the animal, you are violating your claim to protect them. Society is breeding these extra animal numbers in the first place to meet demand. The very people who claim to desire to protect animals are murdering animals every day without justification via the so-called RSPCA homeless shelter system. What is more, people could simply not get pets in the first place if they are so worried! Ever heard of supply and demand? There is also a possibility of regulation. Then both problems are solved at once. If you have a choice at owning a pet or not, even if there is not choice to to "desex" it, then you also inherit the choice not to desex the animal! Of course there is a choice not to desex. So society's reasons don't hold water. Since society actively sponsers and promotes this act, and there is no sane, rational, natural or instinctual purpose to this act, this shows that the mutilation of animals genitals is a malevolent use of the animal as a poison container. [2C]: "SPORT" Hunting. Hunting is the action, given with societal permission, to literally go out and murder animals for no justifiable reason.This is a blatent use of animals as poison containers by society. Even if a hunter of animals did have a legitimate reason to hunt, society does not require him to have one. You can just go out and murder an animal, often one not even on the natural human food chain, for "sport", or entertainment, using an unnatural device used for killing in an unnatural way. The sole reason why society allows hunting, and the reason why it is so popular, is because it is a legal murder act using the animal as a poison container. We will come back to the issue of hunting later. [2D]: Society faucilitates and sponsers not only human child abuse via child ownership, but animal abuse via animal ownership. Despite promoting this as a society, society has the gall to single out one case out of millions, takes it to court, gives out a punishment, and then displays it in all the newpapers. It does this to keep up it's illusion of decency, because it is guilty of sponsoring the mass murder and abuse of animals. The law regarding assault and murder of animals is made so weak, impracticle and so under-policed that it is no real deterrant compared with the human applicable laws. Why is there such a difference? Why the seperate legislation? It can only be because humans consider the animals to be inferior and of less value than humans and therefore set laws that are upposed to protect them that are even less effective than those designed to fail human children. Again, societally-decreed animal poison containers. And now we come to the coup de grace. [2E]: The murder of animals to cathartically relieve thier own rage/hate and dysfunction where there is no clearly no need or purpose to murder the animal. We have already seen this explained in the so-called animal shelter system. I have already proven that the animal shelter systems do not have to murder the animals that humans choose to abduct and place in there. So, what justification, purpose or natural instinct is there that explains why society not only allows, but faucilitates and promotes the obvious murder of individual animals???? None! What mental processess are going through the mind of the human societal leaders and RSPCA leaders who order, recommend, instruct, fauciliate, teach, and promote these act of animal murders? They are simply angry, and enraged citizen-slaves undertaking real-world murders on animals with permission of society. There is no natural instinct or natural brain-function explanation as to why they choose to do these things. Again, societally-decreed animal poison containers. While all humans may not be murderously enraged, or even murderously enraged towards animals exclusively, those leaders, and citizens, who agree with the murder of animals are at least afflicted with a mental complex. This in itself is an act of using an animal as a poison container, for the purpose and participation in an act of murder or support thereof, approved of and sponsered by society. Because of the higher number of sponsered murder of animals vs those of humans, the lesser penalty degrees, the more open and public nature of kennels versus abortion clinics, the acceptance % of humans to media reports of animals being "humanely" put down the only logical conclusion is : Animals are poison containers, and they are the favoured poison-containers in most societies worldwide, as in western-style societies, Most of these forms are fully supported by the RSPCA and equivalents.

The toxic ritual of sports and surrogate activites, and how they co-relate to the mass genocide of animals by societies and the war ritual.

Human sports are a toxic ritual and surrogate activity that mimics the insane war ritual duties of citizen-slaves. But they also can involve the victimiation of animals, too.
What are surrogate activities?

The term was well described by Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski (from his manifesto, article 34) :

"Consider the hypothetical case of a man who can have anything he wants just by wishing for it. Such a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems. At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and by he will become acutely bored and demoralized. Eventually he may become clinically depressed. History shows that leisured aristocracies tend to become decadent. This is not true of fighting aristocracies that have to struggle to maintain their power. But leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic and demoralized, even though they have power. This shows that power is not enough. One must have goals toward which to exercise one's power. Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization. Nonattainment of important goals results in death if the goals are physical necessities, and in frustration if nonattainment of the goals is compatible with survival. Consistent failure to attain goals throughout life results in defeatism, low self-esteem or depression. Thus, in order to avoid serious psychological problems, a human being needs goals whose attainment requires effort, and he must have a reasonable rate of success in attaining his goals."

TED ON SURROGATE ACTIVITIES : "But not every leisured aristocrat becomes bored and demoralized. For example, the emperor Hirohito, instead of sinking into decadent hedonism, devoted himself to marine biology, a field in which he
became distinguished. When people do not have to exert themselves to satisfy their physical needs they often set up artificial goals for themselves. In many cases they then pursue these goals with the same energy and emotional involvement that they otherwise would have put into the search for physical necessities. Thus the aristocrats of the Roman Empire had their literary pretentions; many European aristocrats a few centuries ago invested tremendous time and energy in hunting, though they certainly didn't need the meat; other aristocracies have competed for status through elaborate displays of wealth; and a few aristocrats, like Hirohito, have turned to science. We use the term "surrogate activity" to designate an activity that is directed toward an artificial goal that people set up for themselves merely in order to have some goal to work toward, or let us say, merely for the sake of the "fulfillment" that they get from pursuing the goal. Here is a rule of thumb for the identification of surrogate activities. Given a person who devotes much time and energy to the pursuit of goal X, ask yourself this: If he had to devote most of his time and energy to satisfying his biological needs, and if that effort required him to use his physical and mental facilities in a varied and interesting way, would he feel seriously deprived because he did not attain goal X? If the answer is no, then the person's pursuit of a goal X is a surrogate activity."

- Theodore Kaczynski.

So, all sports are a surrogate activity. Sports are also societally sponsored. However, unlike other surrogate activities, such as marine biology, sports are also toxic and harmful ritual that defines strict rules, that you must obey, overseen by an authority figure whom you must obey. Most sports see you as part of a "team", mimicking the slave-labor environment. Any sane thinker can see how this sports structure is designed to mould the citizen-slaves. But there is more. It also mimicks the insane war ritual! Sports such as football, cricket and basketball are all designed so that two teams who are "enemy" teams must battle each other for no legitimate reason. They must penetrate enemy territory, and strike the "goal", which represents a military target. Again, this is made to condition the citizen-slave to obey orders as part of a team and get them ready to fight in a genocidal war.
Football also doubles as a societally-sponsored outlet for violence, just as abortion and hunting does. Again a specific venue, a time and place, is allocated where you may assault and violently attack other human beings with both legal and societal permission and even encouragement. This is again the poison-container / toxic societal fascist direction of violence system at play. Generally speaking, solitary sports type games such as darts are much less toxic than team sports. However, bodybuilding and other single person sports can be just a toxic and self-harmful to you.
What is really perverse is that animals are fascistly forced into sports by society. We will look at some examples below.

(Above) Sick Society : A ritual of perverse self-harm and abusing animals all rolled into one.	Animals are forced to participate in various rituals of abuse called "sports". Unlike humans, animals are usually aloowed to be murdered in such so-called "sports". One such animal-abuse-ritual is fishing. Here adults and children are given permission by society to torment and murder a Superior form of life. Various smokescreens are used to pretend that the idea is a "game" or even a form of hunting for food. Both these explanations are lies, and were invented by society to lend false legitimacy to fishing.
The Truth is that food is easily and readily available in australia. If one wanted food, one could just open the pantry and get it. There is also a thing called a supermarket. There is no need or requirement to go on elaborate trips that is the most time inefficient method to get food. Especially with the cost of petrol! The reason for these trips is because the actual catching of the fish, and subsequent abuse and murder of the fish, is the goal, not to get food supplies.
Other claims that fishing is for "relaxation" have no merit and are paper-thin. For example, one could relax at a nature spot without fishing. The whole objective of fishing is to cathartically relieve their unpleasant emotional/psychological (usually sub-conscious) states by making the fish suffer and die. In other words, the fish as a poison-container. This is the motivation of all recreational fishermen, and the Forbidden Truth is that this action is supported, sponsored and encouraged by society. Perhaps this is what "relaxation" is supposed to mean. Of course, the fisherman is usaully not consciously aware of his True motivations, and is in deep denial of these Truths and his True Reality state. Amazingly, if I were to hurt or kill a human, not out of "sport" but out of need (such as a violent dispute with a neighbor) society would not encourage the behaviour. In fact it would outrageously claim that I had committed a "crime" and had to be punished. The hypocrisy! There is bull-fighting, as pictured above. This is an ultra-perverse activity on so many levels, and popular in many european type societies. Then we have greyhound racing, which is popular in western cultures. There are too many such animal abuses to list here. Society has invented that many!
Further comments on the societally-sponsored venting of rage on animals. One of the most malevolent and immoral forms of societally sponsored forms of murder is that of humans using technological implements to murder Superior animal life-forms. This is so overt, that you can even buy magazines with murderer's photos smiling over their dead victims in any australian newsagency. The murder of animals for allowing the release of suppressed rage, hate and frustration is not only utterly perverse and immoral, but also highlights how mental and psychological problems are simply ignored and left untreated by society, as long as they do not break any laws or dictates of their society. If we compare each of the legal and socially acceptable murder actions against animals with what would happen if we did that exact same action to a human citizen-slave we see right away that society is utterly hypocritical. Criminal murders such as those by a mass-murderer or arsonist are far less immoral and far more valid that any of the societally-sponsored murders of animals via hunting. This is not only because the animals is morally Superior, purer and less of a threat, but also because of the lack of accurate reflection of the True Reality state by the hunting-based murderer. There is also no provacation by the animal. The hunting murderer was victimized by humans, by human society. It was humanity that initiated the cycle of violence and abuse against him so he is targeting an in-appropriate target for revenge. Even the "education system" child-prison brainwashing centres of societies are known to promotes animals torture an abuse. Let's take a peek into the education system to find an example of children being pressured, co-erced and brainwashed into using non-humanoid living things as a poison container including using them as torture victims and outright brutally and callously murdering them. I speak here of the use of worms as poison-containers by torturing them to death, under the guise of a dissection/science experiment in various schools. This act is ordered and directed by societal-whore-teachers acting on direct behalf of society. Societal leaders know that most children are being horribly oppressed and abused by their parent slave-owners. They know that they are enraged, upset and angry, albeit often at a sub-conscious level. Even though society offers a system of bullying to children i.e. use other children as your poison container, societal leaders still realize that some children just can't victimize other children, and that sometimes other children are not available. Society would also prefer that animals are used as poison containers over humans, even though this is more immoral and unjustifiable than any societal policy of targeting humans. Society therefore teaches children to take out their emotional problems on animals and insects. The child that went through school pulling wings of flies did so because he or she was an extreme torture victim suffering unnatural abuse. This unnatural abuse is reflected, in distorted form, into a manifestation of abusing other living things for emotional/psychological purposes. He used that insect as a very poor form of poison container. At a very young age, in primary school, there is a science class requirement that is in the official school curriculum that orders it's employees to subject children to the perverse views society has for other living things. These dissection of worms class is designed not to teach the child anything useful, but solely to be cruel to and harm animals and other non-human life. To teach them to believe the outrageous lie that humans to be the No. 1 life-form on planet Earth. As the child tortures the innocent and defenseless worm to death, he receives not punishment but praise from an official agent of society, namely a teacher in this case. Societal leaders know that if they can get to children as a group when they are very young that they will be able to program their brains and behaviours more effectively. There is absolutely no legitimate value, use or point to this task of torturing worms. Most children do not learn anything, do not and cannot apply the knowledge gained (if any is to be gained) to any practical task. There is no explanation as to why it is meant to be so important to dissect a worm. There is no direction, no further follow up or study on the slicing up of worms, no use, no sense, nothing. In addition, there is no legitimate reason why worm that was already dead from natural causes could not be used. They could use a worm substitute or even just a text and diagram explanation of worm anatomy could be given. What is to be gained from using a real worm if it's for knowledge, albeit useless knowledge? The only reason why this experiment is taught to children is to program them to associate 'lower' life forms with poison-containers of no value. As usual, please feel free to Email Me if you think you can defend or disprove this Truth. You will fail. Another proof of human society's decree that humans are "above" animals and somehow have a right to harm and kill animals, can be seen in the various legal restrictions placed on manufactured products. In australia, items that are manufactured specifically to hurt other humans are illegal. It is a crime to sell a product that is designed to hurt another human being. The reason for this is not some kind of lovey-dovey care for the citizen-slaves, but to disarm the citizen-slaves. This increases the power of the pig-thugs and other societal agents. This is not to comment on the issue of gun control, and most certainly this is not the time to be side-tracked. However, australian society openly sells products for harming and killing Superior forms of life (non-human forms). Rats, mice and flies are all Superior to humanity. This is because they are not ultra-deranged and ultra-immoral. Yet products like mouse-traps, Mortein fly-spray and poison baits are available at any grocery store and can not only be legally used to murder animals, but are fully societally sponsored and accepted as a perfectly acceptable thing to do, even though that constitutes the outright murder of a Superior life-form. Australian society's message is crystal clear :"Humans are more valuable than animals. Humans may kill animals and insects without any legal or moral judgment or recourse what-so-ever". This brings Me back to the issue of hunting. To the sane, rational and Truth-based thinker the notion that humans are more advanced than animals is completely insane and wrong. Humans are the lowest form of life on this planet. They are hopelessly mentally ill. The human psyche and mental development is faulty. Yes, humans have the highest cognitive function, but only at the price of psychological instability, pathological Truth-rejection. The Truth is that hunting is a form of murder, because it deliberately kills a living sentient creature in unnecessary and avoidable situations for a malicious purpose. This purpose is to use the animal as a poison container. There is no rational and sane explanation as to why murder should only apply to human beings, because there is no sane and valid objective property of human beings that are not possessed by other species of life. The only difference is that humans have advanced cognitive faucilities, but in this case it is a fault and a curse. Further, there is no reason why this level of intelligence should matter. Can a genius murder a retard because he has better cognitive function? Of course not. Society simply does what it has tried and tested - it changes the label from murder to "hunting" an bingo!! - you all blindly presume hunting cannot be murder. A Truth-based term is "animal murdering" or "Superior life-form murdering" or even just "murder". Society even suggests that hunting is a "manly" pursuit. This is to try and appeal and bait men into thinking they should murder an animal to fulfull society's false macho demands it places on men. Society is simply goading men to kill. What is so brave about using a rifle or other technological implement to murder a animal for no reason a hundred yards away? Nothing, it actually represents a rejection of both personal True-Reality Truth and Forbidden Truth so is an act of cowardice! Of course, everything in society is backwards - up is down, sane is insane, rational is irrational and cowardice is bravery. The real reason society promotes hunting is simply because of the poison container concept. Society knows that some humans are deeply and seriously enraged, hateful, frustrated, suicidal, homicidal and even all of those at once! This of course is denied by the enraged hunter, he cannot feel this extreme rage, at least most of the time. It is suppressed into the subconscious. Societal leaders are fearful that this rage may manifest itself into a Truth-revealing attack on society. It knows that these humans are often armed. So it is all too happy to simply give them legal and societal permission to murder innocent life forms that are not members or an integral part of society. Society says "We will allow you to murder, as long as you do so in such a way that suits us societal leaders". Notice that society orders what species and what locations are legal murder targets. For example, you cannot go hunting at a chicken farm, because those chickens are going to be used to feed and fuel citizen-slaves. You cannot hunt around or near suburban areas, just in case in the act of mass-murder a hunter decides to start targeting society and its human citizen-slaves. Societal leaders are also worried about these acts of murder being seen by others, as this makes it harder to hide the Truth of hunting. Again, society is keeping the enraged murderer away from society and the mainstream citizen-slaves. Some might think that this is a "good" thing, as it saves humans. Wrong! Not only are animals Superior over humans, but this mis-direction of True-Reality rage is not legitiamte for the murderer him or herself. Society is directly responsible for creating the enraged and traumatized hunter. Society is even busy promoting, espousing and consolidating the very institutions and policies that turn innocent babies into these enraged and dangerous individuals. Top societal leaders know that they are deliberately continuing the cycle of child abuse and indoctrination with lies and myth that will produce such enraged individuals. It therefore has no legitimate excuse or comeback what-so-ever.
This is the end of this essay. Click here to return to the main index essay area.